Anticipatory and Actual Breach of Contract

Meaning of Contract

As per the Indian Contract Act, a contract is defined as an agreement between two parties on the acceptance of an offer made by one party to the other. A contract has legal enforceability. The joint commitment of two parties to carry out an act as specified in the agreement serves as the fundamental component of a contract. Both parties to a contract are obligated to uphold the promises they make to one another. This results in contract violation if non-performed.

CLAT 2025: 10 Free Mock Tests | Legal Maxims | Landmark Judgements | PYQs

CUET BA LLB 2025:  Legal Studies ebook | 5 Free Mock Tests

MH CET LAW 2025: 10 Free Mock Tests | Legal Reasoning Practice Questions

Monthly Legal Current Affairs:  August’24 | July’24 | June’24

This Story also Contains

1. Meaning of Contract
2. What is a Breach of Contract?
3. Different types of Breach of Contracts
4. Difference between Actual Breach of Contract and Anticipatory Breach of Contract
5. Remedies for Breach of Contract
6. Conclusion

What is a Breach of Contract?

A mutually accepted agreement comes into force when both parties accept its terms and conditions as well as the commitments made within. A legitimate contract is enforceable by law, therefore the parties are obligated to keep their end of the bargain. A contract is broken when one of the parties to it rejects or is unable to carry out the obligations stated in it. A contract specifies the time frame within which the responsibilities and promises stated within it must be fulfilled; if no time frame is given, then the promises and obligations must be completed within a reasonable amount of time. A contract is said to be broken if the act or abstain that was promised in it is not carried out.

Different types of Breach of Contracts

A breach of contract typically happens when one or both parties ignore or refuse to carry out the obligations outlined in the agreement. Depending on whether the parties perform or fail to perform within the terms of the agreement, there are two sorts of contract breaches.

1. Actual Breach of Contract

2. Anticipatory Breach of Contract

Actual Breach of Contract

When one of the parties to a contract neglects, rejects, or fails to carry out its obligations on time as specified in the contract, there has been an actual breach. It doesn't happen too soon. In the event of a real breach of contract, the stipulated window of performance applies. In cases of contract repudiation, the injured or aggrieved party is liberated from his share of responsibilities. Ultimately, this party has the option to sue the Breaching party to recoup damages.

Types of Actual Breach of Contract

1. Late performance as a reason for Actual Breach of Contract-

The actual violation of the contract for non-performance happens when one of the parties does not carry out the desired obligations and promises stated in the agreement. In these circumstances, the non-defaulting party could be held responsible for the other party's breach of the contract even though they are not obligated to keep their end of the bargain. A true breach of contract occurs when one or both parties to a contract neglect to carry out their end of the bargain, as they sincerely intend to fulfil their end of the bargain. In such a scenario, the decision to let the noncompliant party complete the contract would be based on whether time or duration were the primary terms specified in the agreement.

If the time allotted is a determining element in fulfilling contractual duties and responsibilities, then failing to fulfil these duties and obligations within the allotted time will constitute a real violation of the contract. On the other hand, if the fulfilment of the promise takes longer than expected, the party that has suffered a loss may seek damages if time was not a significant factor in the fulfilment of the promise.

2. Actual Breach of Contract During Performance-

It describes a party's unwillingness or inability to fulfil their contractual obligations while performing. It may also occur when one party fulfils its obligations but declines to abide by the main terms and conditions of the contract.

Anticipatory Breach of Contract

Section 39 of the Indian Contract Act addresses anticipatory breach of contract. It states that an anticipatory breach of contract occurs when one of the parties to the contract declines to fulfil their share of the promises or responsibilities stated in the agreement.

An anticipatory breach of contract occurs when there is a legitimate offer and acceptance, but the promises are not carried out because the promise-maker refuses to do so, disregards the promises, or becomes incapable of performing before the deadline for fulfilling the promises has passed.

Essentials to Constitute Anticipatory Breach of Contract

The Essential conditions to constitute an Anticipatory Breach of Contract are as follows-

1. A contract with a future performance date ought to exist.

2. Either party should have purposefully created conditions that make the fulfilment of the promise unavoidable, or they should have refused to fulfil the promise they made

3. It should be more than doubtful or economically impractical for the promise to be fulfilled; rather, it should be achievable.

4. Such a rejection or self-inflicted impossibility should occur before the scheduled performance date.

5. One can explicitly or implicitly refuse.

Effects of Anticipatory Breach of Contract

When one party in a contract fails to fulfil their end of the bargain, this is known as an anticipatory breach of contract. In this scenario, the agreement is terminated.

If one side of the contract doesn't fulfil its end of the bargain, the other party has two options. First, the party impacted may terminate the agreement or file a breach of contract lawsuit against the non-performing party. Secondly, instead of cancelling the contract, the other party can prefer to wait until the day it is meant to be finished.

Difference between Actual Breach of Contract and Anticipatory Breach of Contract

Remedies for Breach of Contract

When it comes to contractual duties, it is expected of both parties to complete their share by the date the contract is supposed to be fulfilled; failure to do so results in a violation of the agreement.

When one party to a contract doesn't fulfil their end of the bargain, the affected parties have the following remedies at their disposal:

• Compensation in the form of damages to be given to the injured party

• The Quantum Meruit Decree

• Specific performance and injunction provisions

1. Compensation in the form of damages to be given to the injured party

The Indian Contract Act of 1872 specifies in Section 73 the amount of damages that must be given as compensation to the injured party. The rights of the individual who has suffered harm or financial loss as a result of a contract violation are covered in this section.

The harmed party's remedy usually consists of getting awarded damages as compensation. In most cases of contract breach, the refund of damages paid is done. This clause binds the non-performing party to pay damages to the aggrieved party as recompense for their failure to fulfil their end of the bargain or their reluctance to carry out the terms of the contract.

As per the Indian Contract Act 1872, section 74, the party that has failed to fulfil their commitment or obligation under a contract is obligated to compensate the aggrieved party for the losses resulting from the non-fulfilment of the contract. Whether the harm suffered by the injured party resulted from either party's failure to fulfill their end of the bargain, or whether the non-performing party was required to reimburse the other party for losses suffered.

2. The Quantam Meriut Decree

A legal phrase used in cases of contract breach is the quantum meruit. "Earned money" is what the Quantum Meruit decree means. The meaning of the term is that if a party to a contract fulfils his or her share of the promises or obligations stated in the agreement, but only completes half of the work, he or she may request payment because he or she has fulfilled half of the promises or obligations made in the agreement. A breach of contract is exempted by the Quantum Meruit decision.

A remedy for breach of contract, the decree of quantum merit is an exception to the general rule of breach of contract. The remedy offered by the Quantum Meruit decree is limited to the work that is currently being completed.

Essentials for the Decree of Quantum Meriut

When using the breach of contract remedies, there are a few considerations that must be made.

One party to the agreement must first declare the other to violate the agreement to prevent the other party from carrying out its share of the bargain.

• Second, after fulfilling their portion of the agreement and suffering harm as a result of the other party's non-performance, either party is officially released from their duty to perform. They are also free to file a claim for damages against the other party for breach of contract.

3. Specific Performance and Injunction Provisions

The provision of specific performance is found in the Specific Relief Act of 1963. The ninth Indian Law Commission introduced the Provisions of Specific Relief Act 1963. When the damages awarded for the breach of contract do not adequately compensate the party that has suffered damages, the rules of specific performance become applicable.

Specifically, The fulfilment of the terms and conditions set forth by the parties constitutes the performance of a contract, as opposed to obtaining payment for damages or other compensation for non-performance. The Specific Relief Act of 1963 states that parties shall not use the damages as a means of making up to the injured party; rather, they shall uphold the provisions of the contract, including fulfilling their obligations and commitments. Because sometimes collecting damages or compensation alone is insufficient to make up for the losses suffered by the harmed party.

How is Specific Performance enforced?

The Specific Relief Act of 1963, Section 10, states that the remedy of specific performance in a breach of contract is enforceable under certain circumstances. These are the prerequisites:

• When the aggrieved party to a contract cannot be compensated for the actual damages they suffered

• when the injured party in a breach of contract does not receive sufficient compensation

Injunction

An injunction is a remedy granted to the party injured by a breach of contract, whereby the court prohibits the other party from acting illegally.

Whether an injunction is temporary or permanent, the court has the discretion to grant it. In these kinds of cases, the court operates per the values of justice, equity, and moral rectitude.

Types of Injunction

1. Temporary Injunction

Temporary injunctions have the purpose of preventing a party from acting for a predetermined amount of time, or until the court determines whether the acts are required to be performed or not. The Code of Civil Procedure 1908 grants the court this authority. Temporary injunctions are a sort of injunction that is only in effect for a brief amount of time. Temporary injunctions only last temporarily; they don't bring an end to the situation.

2. Perpetual injunction

The remedy of a perpetual injunction is only available in cases where the defendant is found to violate the plaintiff's rights or has obtained a decree from the court that allows them to continue to enjoy their property rights indefinitely.

3. Prohibitory Injunction

A prohibitory injunction, as defined in Section 38, forbids or restricts the performance of any conduct. A prohibitory injunction prevents the plaintiff's right from being violated. To prevent a plaintiff from breaching their obligations, prohibitive injunctions are granted.

4. Mandatory injunction

A mandatory injunction must be followed, as per Section 39, which deals with required injunctions. Courts can impose a mandatory injunction to stop a plaintiff from neglecting their obligations. The court may exercise its discretionary powers to order someone to do anything.

Conclusion

A mutually approved agreement becomes legally enforceable when both parties accept its terms and conditions as well as the commitments made within. A legitimate contract binds the parties, and each of them must honour their end of the bargain. A contract is deemed broken when one of the parties declines to carry out the duties outlined in it. The options for addressing contract violations are covered in this article.