Capacity to Contract

A contract is a legally enforceable pact among two or more individuals that establishes legal duties among them. These duties are vital for enabling deals, outlining connections, and establishing a legal structure for different agreements in both personal and commercial settings. The legal capacity to contract is the legal power of a person or a group to form a legally valid agreement that includes legal duties, rights, and responsibilities.

CLAT 2025: 10 Free Mock Tests | Legal Maxims | Landmark Judgements | PYQs

CUET BA LLB 2025:  Legal Studies ebook | 5 Free Mock Tests

MH CET LAW 2025: 10 Free Mock Tests | Legal Reasoning Practice Questions

Monthly Legal Current Affairs:  August’24 | July’24 | June’24

This Story also Contains

1. Meaning of Capacity to Contract
2. Essentials elements to constitute a Valid Contract
3. Capacity to form a Valid Contract
4. Case laws on Capacity to Contract
5. Conclusion

The idea of legal capacity to contract refers to the mental and legal ability required for individuals to comprehend the details and agreements of a contract, make knowledgeable choices about it, and be responsible for their promises under the contract. The legal capacity to enter into contracts is a fundamental principle that supports the operation of agreements under legal rules.

Meaning of Capacity to Contract

Legal ability concerns the fundamental inquiry of whether the individuals participating in a contract have the necessary mental and legal skills to sign enforceable contracts. This detailed idea delves into different mental skills, considerations related to age, and the absence of pressure that strengthens the ability of people and organizations to move through the landscape of agreements.

In essence, the legal capacity to contract acts as a safeguard and aids in making sure that the involved parties consent, are aware, and make decisions freely in entering into agreements.

The ability of an individual or an organization to legally create a commercial agreement is referred to as "capacity to contract" in this context. Before accepting the terms of the contract, the business partner must be competent and fulfil the requirements, according to business law rules.

Essentials elements to constitute a Valid Contract

To create a legally binding agreement, certain requirements must be met. Below are the conditions-

• There must be two involved parties who have mutually agreed upon the terms.

• Additionally, there must be an offer that is valid and accepted by both parties. -

• The individuals who are signing the contract must be capable of making such an agreement. Neither party should be under the influence of alcohol or drugs.

• In a legally binding agreement, there must be legal consideration and a legal purpose.

• A contract needs a free agreement to be enforceable. No party to the agreement should be forced to comply.

• If the contract expressly states that it is void from the outset, then it will be deemed void.

Capacity to form a Valid Contract

In accordance with Section 11 of the Indian Contract Act 1872, "Every individual capable of entering into agreements is of legal age, as defined by the applicable law, and possesses the mental capacity to do so, and is not barred from entering into agreements by any relevant laws."

The three main conditions to be taken into consideration to form a valid contract which is known as the capacity of the contract are-

1. Party to a contract shouldn’t be a minor-

The age of legal adulthood is a milestone set by legal frameworks, marking the point at which a person is deemed sufficiently responsible to sign a legally binding agreement. Different regions might set this age at a different level. In India, for instance, it's typically 18 years old in most situations; yet, it rises to 21 years if a guardian has been designated by the court. Anyone under the age of legal adulthood is recognized as a minor. Legally speaking, contracts signed by minors are void.

The Indian Majority Act of 1875 established the age of majority at eighteen, which is the legal age of adulthood in India. This implies that an individual must be at least eighteen years old to be a party to a contract. Anything less and they are not legally considered capable of entering into a contract. In India, a resident under the age of 18 is classified as a minor.

Minor as a beneficiary to a contract

According to Section 30 of the Indian Partnership Act 1932, While a person under 18 lacks the legal ability to enter into agreements, the Contract Act does not forbid them from forcing the agreement upon the other party. Therefore, a promise made in a minor's favour is legally valid and can be pursued in a court of law. A person under 18 is not allowed to become a partner in a business. Yet, they might, with the agreement of all partners, receive the advantages of being a partner

Pleading powers of a minor

If a minor's agreement is deemed invalid, any funds given to a minor through a promissory note or any other means cannot be reclaimed. This applies even if a minor obtains a loan by falsely claiming to be of legal age, as it does not prevent them from arguing their status as a minor in a legal action to reclaim the funds, and the case will be dismissed.

But in situations where a juvenile has fraudulently obtained a mortgage and sold certain properties, the court has decided that both the buyer and the lender must be compensated when the minor terminates the transaction.

Contract by Guardian on behalf of a minor

In specific situations, a guardian for a minor has the authority to sign a legally binding agreement on behalf of the minor. This agreement, which the guardian signs for the minor's advantage, can be upheld by the minor. However, a guardian cannot enter into a legally enforceable contract with a child to buy real estate. A court-appointed guardian's signed consent to sell the minor's property, however, must be authorized by the court for it to be enforceable.

Furthermore, the adult is in charge of the contract if it is made between them via the guardian acting on behalf of the child.

2. Soundness of mind to constitute a Valid Contract

The contract involving an individual who is mentally unstable in India is invalid. According to Section 12 of the Indian Contract Act, an individual is considered to be of sound mind if, at the time the contract is executed, they are aware of its terms and are able to rationally consider their options while considering the potential outcomes.

Furthermore, a person who is normally not in a sound mental condition but might occasionally be able to do so can sign a contract when they are. On the other hand, even a sound individual might not be able to make a contract if they are in a sound state. This concerns those who are considered to be in an unstable state, such as the inebriated, the deranged, or the foolish.

A person with a mental disorder is not allowed to sign contracts, as per the Indian Contract Act. Even though a contract signed by a mentally ill person is regarded as null and void, such a person is permitted to sign a legally binding contract while having epiphanies. Evaluating a disturbed mind entails figuring out how well the person can understand the conditions of the agreement and rationally decide how it will affect their interests. It's commonly accepted that foolish, insane, and inebriated individuals are among those with disturbed brains.

3. Disqualification by law

Children and persons with mental disabilities are not the only categories of people who cannot enter into contracts. This could be the result of several things, including your legal status and political membership. Foreign heads of state, diplomats, state adversaries, prisoners, bankrupts, and so forth are a few examples of these people

• Residents of Alien Country

Foreign enemies are people who live in India but are not citizens of other countries. Only in times of peace are these people able to make agreements with the Indian people. The regulations of the government also apply to these agreements. If his nation and India declare war on one another, he is labelled as an enemy foreign to the country and is unable to negotiate. If a foreign national signs a contract before the declaration of war, it will be suspended for the duration of the war. After the conflict ends, if the agreement hasn't been extended past the allotted term, it can be reinstated.

• An accused serving a sentence

A person who has been found guilty and is incarcerated is not allowed to sign contracts. They are also not permitted to file a lawsuit against any contracts they had before their sentence. They are free to pursue legal actions when their sentence has expired.

• A married women

Legally speaking, a married woman cannot sign any documents about her husband's belongings. If he doesn't provide for her, she can, nevertheless, act on his behalf and legally be accountable for his belongings.

• A person who is insolvent

A person who has been declared bankrupt is permitted to sign certain kinds of contracts. This person is allowed to work for a firm, acquire debt, and purchase real estate, but he is not authorized to sell it. He is not allowed to direct a business, hold public office, or serve on a municipal government body, among other prohibitions. Still, this person can make agreements, except for those involving his possessions. He is recognized as a regular citizen after his bankruptcy is declared null and void.

• A Pardanashin Women

If a panda is keeping watch over someone, then that person is under too much pressure. She lacks the understanding necessary to enter into contracts since she is unable to comprehend their implications.

• An Ambassador from different countries

International laws provide diplomatic immunity to foreign consulate and ambassador staff members. As a result, Indian law cannot force these people to fulfil their contractual duties. To enforce the terms of their agreements with them, they may, nevertheless, file a lawsuit. However, they are immune from lawsuits without the federal government's consent. As a result, consular employees and ambassadors have a unique position but aren't considered to have the legal capacity to sign contracts.

• Legal practitioners, judges and officers

Judges, lawyers, or officials with a personal interest in the case involving enforceable disputes are not allowed to sign a contract.

• Employees of patent offices

The staff and the officials at the patent office cannot claim ownership, acquire, or hold an interest in the patent granted to them while they are in office.

Case laws on Capacity to Contract

In the case of, Mohori Bibee v. Dharmadose Ghose( 1903)

In this situation, Dharmodas Ghose, who was under the age of majority, took out a loan on his property from an individual called Brahmo Dutta. When Ghose attempted to cancel the agreement, the court ruled in his favour

The lower courts in India decided in Ghose's favour, stating that Mohori Bibee was responsible for the loan since she had acted as her representative as an adult. Nonetheless, when the case was taken to the Privy Council, the supreme court of appeal in India at the time, the ruling was overturned. The Privy Council declared that a contract made by a minor is invalid from the start, no matter if the minor lied about their age.

The judge concluded that young people are not legally able to make enforceable agreements, and any effort to do so is null and void right from the beginning. This concept is founded on the notion that young individuals lack the full understanding of the legal repercussions of their behaviour and thus require safeguards against being taken advantage of.

In the case of, Suraj Narain v. Sukhu Aheer

An individual took out a loan while he was a minor and subsequently entered into a new agreement with a promise to repay the loan with added interest once he reached the age of majority. The central issue in the case presented to the Allahabad High Court was whether the financial benefits someone received while they were minors could be considered valid as consideration for a new agreement they made once they reached adulthood.

In a 2:1 ruling, the court upheld this interpretation, holding that benefits acquired while a minor did not qualify as legitimate consideration for a new agreement under the strict reading of section 2(d) of the legislature. Therefore, the original promise maker was released from liability concerning the provisions of the new agreement.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the idea of having the legal capacity to enter into agreements is a basic aspect of contract law that usually enhances the fairness of a contract. But as previously mentioned, age, mental capacity, and standard-following behaviour are the three fundamental components of legal capacity that are recognized by all legal systems globally. The capacity and requirements required to form a valid contract should be taken into consideration for a valid contract to take place.