Criminal Misappropriation of Property

Section 403 and Section 404 of the Indian Penal Code 1860 deal with Criminal Misappropriation of Property. It is termed as a serious offence according to the code. Criminal misappropriation of Property involves dishonest use of someone's property without the owner's consent. The offender needs to have the intention to cause damage to the owner of the property by such an illegal act. While Section 404 of the Indian Penal Code addresses the provisions of the unlawful misappropriation of a deceased person's property, Section 403 of the Indian Penal Code discusses dishonest misappropriation and the prescribed punishment under this offence.

CLAT 2025: 10 Free Mock Tests | Legal Maxims | Landmark Judgements | PYQs

CUET BA LLB 2025:  Legal Studies ebook | 5 Free Mock Tests

MH CET LAW 2025: 10 Free Mock Tests | Legal Reasoning Practice Questions

Monthly Legal Current Affairs:  August’24 | July’24 | June’24

This Story also Contains

1. Definition of Criminal Misappropriation of Property
2. Essentials of Criminal Misappropriation of Property
3. Punishment for Criminal Misappropriation of Property
4. Aggravated Form of Criminal Misappropriation
5. Misappropriation of Property of a Deceased Person
6. Finder of Goods
7. Essentials of Section 404 of IPC
8. Case Laws on Criminal Misappropriation of Property
9. Conclusion

Definition of Criminal Misappropriation of Property

The dishonest appropriation of another person's property without that person's consent is criminal misappropriation of property. The Indian Penal Code's Section 403 defines it as "Anyone who dishonestly misappropriates or converts any movable property to his use shall be punished with a fine, or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years."

The non-violent crime of criminal misappropriation of property can take many different forms. A worker stealing money from their employer's cash register, a friend taking an expensive item from a friend's residence without permission, or a contractor utilizing building supplies for their personal use without authorization are a few examples of what this could entail. The accused must always have acted dishonestly and removed or altered the property without the owner's permission.

Essentials of Criminal Misappropriation of Property

Dishonest Intention of the Offender

The accused must have had a dishonest intention for the crime of criminal misappropriation of property to be committed. This suggests that the accused must have intended to seize or modify the property for their use without the owner's consent. The accused must have planned to deceive the property owner in some way for them to have had a dishonest intention. This deception can take many different forms, including misuse of authority, concealment, and false representation.

Criminal Appropriation

Appropriation is the second crucial component in illicit property misappropriation. This implies that the item has to have been seized or altered by the accused for personal use. Appropriation can occur in a variety of ways, including the actual taking, using, transferring, or disposing of the property. There must have been some mechanism for the accused to exert control over the property.

No Consent of the Owner

Without consent is the third and last necessary component of unlawful misuse of property. This suggests that the accused must have stolen or changed the property without the owner's consent. For the owner's consent to be deemed genuine, they must have been aware of the act and given their voluntary consent. If the owner had not been notified of the act or had not given their consent, the accused would not have acted with consent.

Conversion of the Property

The core of this provision is that converting any property for one's personal use is what makes it a criminal misappropriation offence. According to Ramaswami Nadar v. The State of Madras (1957), the phrase "converts to his use" implies using or handling property in a way that violates the owner's rights.

Punishment for Criminal Misappropriation of Property

The Indian Penal Code's Section 403 describes the penalties for stealing property. According to this clause, a person who commits the crime of dishonestly misappropriating property faces a maximum two-year jail sentence, a fine, or both.

Aggravated Form of Criminal Misappropriation

The Indian Penal Code's Section 404 addresses the more serious offence of dishonestly misappropriating property owned by a deceased person at the time of their death.

According to Section 404 of the Indian Penal Code, anyone found guilty of dishonestly misappropriating property that belonged to a deceased person at the time of their death faces up to three years in prison of any kind as well as a fine.

A person who worked as a servant or clerk for a deceased person may be subject to up to seven years in prison and a fine under Section 404 of the Indian Penal Code if they commit dishonest misappropriation of property. A clerk or servant is liable to harsher sanctions because they have a fiduciary or trust-based relationship with their employer.

Misappropriation of Property of a Deceased Person

A more serious instance of criminal misappropriation is defined under Section 404 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. According to Section 404 of the Indian Penal Code, a person commits the crime of criminal misappropriation when they dishonestly misappropriate or use someone else's property for their benefit or to capitalize it for their use. They may be punished with a fine, imprisonment for a minimum of one year or both. The penalty could last up to seven years if it is discovered that the perpetrator worked as a clerk or servant for the deceased at the time of their death. This section serves the goal of protecting a deceased person's possessions that, in some circumstances, need further security. This part is used to punish outsiders, housekeepers, and attendants who have no stake or right in the deceased man's possessions.

Finder of Goods

A later change in intention does not render possession illegal if the original intention was not dishonest when it was taken. The section's explanation highlights that if the finder of the items has taken all reasonable steps to identify the legitimate owner and has held the goods for a fair amount of time to return them to the actual owner, he may utilize the property for himself if the true owner cannot be located. However, he would be responsible for violating the clause if he immediately misappropriated the property.

Essentials of Section 404 of IPC

For an individual to be held accountable for an offence listed in Section 404 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, they need to meet the following prerequisites:

• The property needs to be transportable or movable, and

• it needs to have been in the deceased person's possession when they passed away.

• The accused must have had dishonest intentions when committing the offence in question.

• The offender converted it or misappropriated it for his use.

Case Laws on Criminal Misappropriation of Property

In the case of Mohan Lal v. State of Punjab

In this case, The defendant in this case was accused of criminal misappropriation of property after abusing money that a public sector bank had entrusted to him. According to Section 403 of the IPC, the offender was found to have committed criminal misappropriation of property and misused cash.

In the case of, R.K. Dalmia v. Delhi Administration

In this case, In this judgment, the Supreme Court of India decided that, by Section 403 of the IPC, stealing money may be deemed a criminal misuse of property. The court stated unequivocally that since money is considered "property," misappropriating it might be considered misappropriating property.

Conclusion

Sections 403 and 404 of the Indian Penal Code address the criminal misappropriation of property, according to this article. Criminal Misappropriation of Property means dishonest use of someone’s property without their consent. In Criminal Misappropriation of property, an offender enters into someone's property and uses it in such a way that such actions cause harm to the owner of the property. The Criminal Misappropriation of Property is a serious crime in India.