When a lawful right is violated without causing trouble, misfortune, or injury to the party violated, this is known as injuria sine damno. The person whose right is violated then is entitled to file a lawsuit. Every person has an unalienable right to their possessions, invulnerability, and freedom; any infringement on these rights is therefore grave. A person whose legal rights have been violated has a reason for acting, even if that reason is purposefully brought about by an infringement of another person's legal rights. The Injuria Sine damno is a right under the law of Torts.
CLAT 2025: 10 Free Mock Tests | Legal Maxims | Landmark Judgements | PYQs
CUET BA LLB 2025: Legal Studies ebook | 5 Free Mock Tests
MH CET LAW 2025: 10 Free Mock Tests | Legal Reasoning Practice Questions
Monthly Legal Current Affairs: August’24 | July’24 | June’24
A tort occurs when the perpetrator violates the legal rights of another person, which are covered under tort law. This is considered a wrongdoing by the individual who performs it. Members of society are required by the legal system to uphold their legal rights. A breach of contract arises when any of the parties to the agreement fail to fulfil their obligations as specified in the agreement, much as a crime is an unlawful conduct that happens as a result of breaking a legal responsibility that is recognized by the criminal code.
Therefore, a tort is defined as a legal wrong that extends beyond a simple breach of contract or trust and that may be resolved through a lawsuit seeking unclear damages.
To be found liable for a civil wrong, one must have committed an act that was not expected of them or neglected to fulfil an obligation. Either a deliberate act of injury or a legal inaction might result in liability.
For a plaintiff's tort suit to be successful, they must demonstrate that they have incurred legal harm. This means providing evidence that the plaintiff's legal rights or obligations were infringed upon by an improper action, which could be the result of an act or omission. In the absence of a similar infringement of a legal right, there is no foundation for a tort law lawsuit. That is the meaning behind the Latin saying "Injuria Sine Damno." Any unauthorized interference, no matter how minor, with the plaintiff's legal rights or the violation of a right that the plaintiff has been granted is referred to as "injuria". Damnum, on the other hand, indicates grave harm, loss, or damage about riches, comfort, health, etc. The plaintiff may nevertheless bring a lawsuit even in situations where there is injuria, or the violation of a legal right, without their suffering immediate harm, since no one's rights should be infringed upon.
The legal principle known as "Damnum sine injuria" states that there must be damage in addition to an unlawful interference with the plaintiff's legal rights. For example, it is not actionable to cause serious harm to another person unless the plaintiff's legal rights are breached. This usually happens when the plaintiff is harmed by the defendant's exercise of their legal rights.
It's not always the case that someone who gets hurt because of another person's behaviour can file a lawsuit against that person. Even in cases when the behaviour was deliberate, the aggrieved person cannot sue the defendant if they are acting under their legal rights.
The legal doctrine known as Damnum Sine Injuria is applicable when no one's rights are violated. For people who have lost something or experienced injury as a result of having a legal right violated, the court grants them the right to compensation.
Injuria Sine Damno is the legal term for a violation of a right or an injury without any accompanying real harm or loss. It refers to a situation in which someone's legal rights are infringed upon even in the absence of any real bodily harm or loss.
Injuria Sine Damno acknowledges that some infringements of legal rights, regardless of whether they result in immediate injury or not, may be regarded as unlawful acts. In certain situations, the person who feels wronged may still be able to pursue legal action to defend their rights and obtain just compensation.
"Juria sine damno" refers to a legal right that is infringed against without resulting in any harm, loss, or suffering for the person who is violated. There are two kinds of torts. The first group includes torts that are actionable by nature, meaning that no proof of harm or loss is required to bring a claim for them. For instance, even in cases when there is no physical harm, trespassing is seen as an inherently actionable offence. Evidence of loss or damage brought about by the defendant's activities must exist to prosecute the second category of torts.
The first category of tort is examined as injuria sine damno. In some cases, it is not required to demonstrate that the defendant's acts directly caused any injury to the individual who was injured. It is sufficient to show that the defendant violated the plaintiff's legal rights for the claim to be successful. Stated differently, there exists an injuria.
Denying the plaintiff, a qualified voter, the opportunity to vote in the parliamentary elections was unjust. Because his preferred candidate had already won, he did not suffer any direct harm, yet the defendants were nevertheless held accountable. This decision established the rule that harm encompasses more than just monetary loss and that an individual's rights are violated, giving rise to the right to seek legal redress.
In this case, it was held that where there has been an unjustified infringement on someone else's property, nominal damages are typically paid and the injuria sine damno concept applies to immovable property. It was also determined that the rule could not be applied in all cases of property attachment, regardless of the specific circumstances.
No. | Injuria Sine Damno | Damnum Sine Injuria |
1. | It is civil damage to the plaintiff without jeopardizing the actual injury. | It does not violate the defendant's legal rights; rather, it pertains to their damages. |
2. | A complainant's legal rights have been violated when they bring a lawsuit. | It is the amount of damages incurred without violating anyone's legal rights. |
3. | Regarding Injuria Sine Damnum, the court granted compensation. | In this instance, the court grants no compensation. |
4. | It mostly refers to legal errors here. | It is generally applied in cases of moral transgression. |
5. | In this case, the plaintiff experiences legal harm. | In this case, the plaintiff suffers a setback yet avoids legal consequences. |
6. | The Injuria Sine Damnum theory is invoked in cases of civil rights violations. | Damnum sine injuria provides coverage for damages without harm. |
Injuria Sine Damno acknowledges that some infringements of legal rights, regardless of whether they result in immediate injury or not, may be regarded as unlawful acts. In certain situations, the person who feels wronged may still be able to pursue legal action to defend their rights and obtain just compensation.
Injuria Sine Demno denotes the infringement of a legal right without endangering, losing, or harming the plaintiff.
"Injuria sine damno" refers to circumstances in which a person's legal rights were infringed upon without causing them to incur a pecuniary loss. It is a legal injury without harm.
The famous case for Injuria Sine Damno is Ashby v. White.
Damnum Sine Injuria means If there is genuine loss or harm but no legal right has been violated, no action will be allowed.
The famous case in Damnum Sine Injuria is the Gloucester Grammar School case.
06 Nov'24 08:55 AM
06 Nov'24 08:48 AM
06 Nov'24 08:44 AM
06 Nov'24 08:41 AM
06 Nov'24 08:37 AM
06 Nov'24 08:34 AM
05 Nov'24 06:36 PM
05 Nov'24 05:31 PM
05 Nov'24 05:20 PM
05 Nov'24 05:14 PM