IPC: Offences Relating to Documents and Property Marks

Different crimes related to documents fall under the Indian Penal Code 1860. In India, having access to legal documents is crucial in a case and for presenting evidence in court. The term "document" is defined in section 3 of the Indian Evidence Act 1872, which states, "A document is any written, printed, or recorded material, whether in words, figures, or marks, or a combination of these, created to be used or potentially used to record that information."

CLAT 2025: 10 Free Mock Tests | Legal Maxims | Landmark Judgements | PYQs

CUET BA LLB 2025:  Legal Studies ebook | 5 Free Mock Tests

MH CET LAW 2025: 10 Free Mock Tests | Legal Reasoning Practice Questions

Monthly Legal Current Affairs:  August’24 | July’24 | June’24

This Story also Contains

1. Overview of Offences relating to Documents
2. Reasons for Forgery
3. Fundamental elements of forgery
4. Important Provisions of Forgery
5. Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code
6. Offence of Mischief
7. Criminal Trespass
8. Conclusion

A legitimate legal document is essential, especially when dealing with legal issues. These documents are vital evidence in legal proceedings. Forging, modifying, and creating counterfeit documents are considered offences under the Indian Penal Code 1860 and The Indian Evidence Act 1872, according to the country's legal system and other statutes. Both legal professionals and the general populace need to understand the repercussions of forging, manipulating, or creating fraudulent documents, and the potential legal consequences of such actions should be made known to both legal practitioners and the general public.

Overview of Offences relating to Documents

In India, as outlined in the Indian Evidence Act of 1872, the term "document" encompasses a wide range of items, including photographs, written, drafted, printed, video, and audio recordings, as well as electronic documents, all falling within the scope of the definition outlined in Section 4 of the Indian Evidence Act 1872.

Forging documents is the most serious crime associated with counterfeit documents in India. Other common crimes involving counterfeit documents include fabricating phone documents, altering documents, and producing counterfeit documents.

Producing and using counterfeit documents is covered under the Indian Penal Code 1860, Chapter 471, which states that "Individuals who knowingly or with deceitfully employ as authentic any document or digital record, which they are aware of or reasonably suspect to be counterfeit, shall face punishment identical to that of if they had forged such documents or digital records." The severity of punishment for generating counterfeit documents varies depending on the particular offence committed in terms of legal ramifications.

A two-year prison sentence, a fine, or both may be imposed as punishment for forgeries. Under Indian law, producing false documents can lead to a prison term of up to seven years along with a fine or both. Furthermore, the punishment and fine can increase significantly if the motive behind creating the counterfeit document or forgery is to cause damage or harm to another person

Reasons for Forgery

Forgery, in simple terms, refers to the making of counterfeit or bogus documents. When the act of producing these fake documents is done to cause harm or damage to someone, it constitutes a crime as per Section 463 of the Indian Penal Code 1860.

Forgery involves any individual who creates documents to mislead a specific authority, which includes the fabrication of signatures, photographs, and other falsified information within a document. In Indian legal terms, forgery is considered a form of fraud and is met with appropriate penalties.

This offence applies to a variety of documents, including birth certificates, educational credentials, proof of residence, Aadhaar or PAN cards, voter ID, and other identification cards. The most prevalent form of forgery involves endorsing legal documents on behalf of others, particularly in the case of bank-issued cheques intended to facilitate the withdrawal of funds from another person with the intent to cause harm or damage.

In addition, someone makes a false record to break the law.

• hurt or injure someone else.

• Sign a contract with deceit.

• Disregard ownership of anything that isn't legally yours.

• violate someone's right to their property.

Anyone preparing to commit the aforementioned crime suffers legal repercussions for doing so.

Fundamental elements of forgery

1. Creation of false Documents

The first and most crucial phase in the forging process is creating a bogus document to harm someone or change a genuine document. The procedure of manufacturing a counterfeit document is described in Section 464 of The Indian Penal Code 1860. It prohibits using deception or fraud to force someone else to sign, seal, execute, modify, or add their electronic signature to an electronic record, even if you know the person is either mentally ill or intoxicated, or that they have been tricked into thinking they don't understand the document, the electronic record, or the changes that have been made.

2. Creation of a Fake Document to damage someone

The individual responsible for producing a counterfeit document must harbour malicious intent aimed at hurting or damaging an individual or the broader community.

In the instance of Sanjiv Ratanappa v. Emperor AIR 1932, the judiciary determined that an individual will not be held accountable under section 463 of the Indian Penal Code 1860 if a police officer records or composes allegations in their diary concerning an individual or an event, provided they did not monitor the person in question or the individual under police surveillance, and such actions did not result in any harm or injury to the person.

3. To fake or claim it

This is the third critical aspect of forging documents, where an individual produces or alters a document to secure ownership of something or to falsely assert rights to it, resulting in the act of forgery.

Example: Property owner A stipulates in his will that B and C will each get the same amount of his inheritance upon his death. However, after A dies, B removes C from the will to assert her sole ownership of the assets because she thinks she will always be the owner. This is the act of falsifying paperwork to seem like the owner of the asset.

4. The Commission of an offence

This is the fourth and final crucial factor that contributes to forgery, indicating that the act of producing an impersonation document constitutes the initial stages of the crime. Subsequently, if a person engages in forgery to secure a title or harm another individual, it constitutes a forgery.

5. Punishment for the offence of Forgery

The penalty for forgery is outlined in section 465 of the Indian Penal Code 1860. This code states that forgery is an offence for which a magistrate of the first class may try you without the need for bail. According to section 465, anybody convicted of forgery could get a two-year prison sentence, a fine, or both, based on how serious the crime against the victim was.

In the Ram Narain Polly v. Central Bureau of Investigation case, it was decided that an act had to be performed to harm or damage another person for it to be considered forgery.

Important Provisions of Forgery

Section 465: Punishment for the offence of Forgery

Article 465 of the Indian Penal Code 1860 specifies the consequences faced by an individual for the crime of document forgery. According to this article, the penalty for forgery includes a term of 2 years in jail, in addition to a fine or a combination of both, contingent upon the harm caused by the fraudulent document.

Section 466: Forgery of record of court

The Indian Penal Code, 1860, Chapter 466, deals with the crime of forging documents for official court records or public registers, among other things. This chapter states that there will be consequences for anyone who creates an electronic record or document meant to be submitted to a public official or authority, for marriage, adoption, or death, or to a court of law. These penalties can include imprisonment for a term of 7 years, a fine, or a combination of both

Section 467: Forgery of valuable security, will, agreement etc

According to IPC Section 467, anyone convicted of creating a document that falsely represents itself as a valuable security deed, will or power of attorney for property transfer, a document permitting someone to either accept or disburse funds or any significant assets, will face a sentence of life imprisonment or up to ten years in jail. Additionally, they will have to pay a fine for the crime of document forgery.

Section 468: Forgery for cheating

According to section 468 of the Indian Penal Code, forgery to deceive involves being penalized with a term of imprisonment that could range from seven years to a fine, or possibly both.

Section 469: Forgery to harm anyone's reputation

Chapter 469 of the Indian Penal Code states that anyone found guilty of forging a document or electronic record with the intent to damage the reputation of another individual or entity will face imprisonment for a duration ranging from a few months to up to three years.

Section 470 and 471: Forgery of documents and liability for it

The crime of forging papers is covered by Article 470 of the Indian Penal Code, which states that any fake document or electronic record that is meant to be used to present a forged one is punishable by law.

Article 471

outlines the responsibility of the individual for creating forgeries that are genuine documents. However, there is an exception mentioned in this article, which states that if the individual is aware that the document being forged is real, he will be subject to penalties under the law.

Section 472 and section 473: Forgery of making a counterfeit seal, etc

Article 472 states that an individual caught creating a fake seal plate or any other tool to give the impression that it is genuine or can be used to produce other documents will face penalties under Article 467 of this legislation. This includes being sentenced to life in prison, serving a term that is longer than seven years, paying a fine, or a combination of these punishments.

Section 474: Using a document which is termed forged under sections 466 and 467 and used to be genuine one:

Article 474 states that an individual will face consequences even upon realizing that the documents they are utilizing are counterfeit, as outlined in sections 466 and 467. Case laws. There are severe consequences for using these fake documents as real ones, such as life in jail, a maximum seven-year sentence, a fine, or all of these.

Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code

According to Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), rape is punishable by harsh imprisonment for a minimum of 10 years and up to life imprisonment, except in specific situations. The perpetrator may also be required to pay a fine.

Section 376C allows the authority to exploit his fiduciary for sexual intercourse without her permission or against her will, but remaining accountable for abuse of authority rather than rape. It allows fiduciary-rapists to use their authority to seek nonconsensual sex.

Ibrahim and Ors v. State of Bihar and Anr., 2009

In this case, the accused person executed two formal sale agreements on behalf of another person using fake documents in an unethical and dishonest way. The accused person had no ownership or connection to any particular property.

• It was clarified that a person is considered to have forged a document or produced a false document under the following conditions:

• If he created a document or signed one that purported to be his own but was someone else's.

• If the accused made any changes or alterations to the document.

• If he employed deceitful tactics to acquire the document from a person who was not aware of it.

A.S. Krishnan v. State of Kerela, 2004

• In this instance, a father created a falsified mark sheet for his son to secure enrollment in a medical program. The sum of the marks listed on the forged sheet exceeded those on the genuine sheet. The father altered the marks on the sheet to ensure his son's entry into the medical program.
• The Supreme Court, in this matter, determined that the defendant was responsible and was found guilty under Section 471 of the Indian Penal Code 1860. This was because they were aware that the mark sheet was fabricated but still utilized it for admission.

The Stamp Paper Scam, 2003

• In this scenario, Abdul Karim Telgi, the architect of the scheme, conceived the plan to produce counterfeit stamp paper, amassing a fortune through this illicit activity. Through his connections at the Indian Security Press in Nasik, he obtained junk machinery that he used for the fraudulent purpose of creating fake stamp paper.
• He built up a large network by paying commissions to officials in the government as well as merchants. Since it was difficult to tell real stamp paper from false, over 300 dealers who had previously offered genuine stamp paper started selling Telgi's counterfeit product. Telgi operated in seventy-five cities and thirteen states. He hired 300 more people to help pull off this scam, and he kept 120 bank accounts open to ensure the plan ran well.
• Two people were apprehended in 2000 while delivering Telgi's counterfeit stamps in Karnataka after law enforcement obtained intelligence on the circulation of counterfeit stamp documents. Telgi was captured on the way to Ajmer. All of the paperwork about the counterfeit stamps was seized after his arrest in 2003.
• The operation has been in full swing since 1994, ranking among the largest frauds in Indian history. He faced legal action and was investigated under multiple sections for breaking various laws, including Section 255, Section 248, Section 259, Section 420, Section 467, Section 468, Section 471, Section 474, and Section 475 of the Indian Penal Code 1860.

Offence of Mischief

• The Indian Penal Code's Chapter 425 deals with mischief as a crime. According to this chapter, mischief is defined as the deliberate destruction of another person's property to lower its value or usefulness and cause loss or damage to the property.
• Put simply, mischief is defined as any action that impedes on another person's ability to use and enjoy their property.

The objective of the provision of Mischief

• The Indian Penal Code 1860's anti-vandalism rules were designed to safeguard people's rights to their homes and personal belongings. These rules protect property from being damaged or lost as a result of other people's deliberate actions.
• The legal precept "Sic utere tuemur," which roughly translates to "You may use property, but not in a way that could harm your neighbour's property," served as the foundation for these rules. This principle suggests that individuals have the right to use their property as they wish, but in doing so, they should consider that their actions shouldn't cause problems or damage to the property of others.

Essential conditions of mischief

1. The intention behind causing the act:

• The purpose is the initial and most crucial element needed to define a wrongdoing. The motive for someone to carry out a wrongdoing is evaluated to determine if it constitutes a wrongdoing.
• According to the Indian Penal Code (IPC), a crime consists of two components: Mens Rea and Actus Rea. These elements are interconnected to demonstrate a crime or an offence. Men's Rea is an important component that is necessary to evaluate or demonstrate misconduct.
• In the Nagnedranath Roy v. Dr Bijoy Kumar Dasburma case,
• It has been established that an act of negligence alone does not establish that it was malicious. A mischievous act can also be defined as one that is committed with the deliberate aim of damaging someone else's property or personal belongings.

2. Destruction should be the result of the act.

This is the second essential component required to describe mischief; it means that any activity that results in damage, loss, or injury to property or a person's belongings is mischievous. It is also known as "Actus Rea," which is an action carried out with the deliberate intent to cause injury.

3. Diminishing the value of the property should be the result of the act

This brings us to the third and last essential component required to illustrate an act of mischief. According to this, an act must be done maliciously and cause damage or loss to property for it to be classified as mischief to the property. Additionally, the value and utility of the property ought to decline as a result of the act.

Punishment for Mischief

The Indian Penal Code 1860s Chapter 426 describes the punishments for the offence of causing difficulty. It states that anyone found guilty of causing disturbance by causing damage to another person's property or personal belongings may be sentenced to up to three months in jail, a fine, or both. A magistrate of the first class may try someone for mischief, even if it is not a recognized offence under the law.

Criminal Trespass

• Chapter 441 of the Indian Penal Code 1860 addresses the crime of criminal trespass. This chapter outlines that an individual who unlawfully enters someone else's property to harm the property or cause a loss is guilty of criminal trespass.
• Therefore, it can be understood that when someone unlawfully enters another person's private property without any legal right to do so is referred to as criminal trespass of property.
• The primary goal of this law is to guarantee that individuals can use their private property peacefully, without any interference, disruption, or security violations from external parties
• Chapter 447 of the Indian Penal Code 1860 addresses the penalties for criminal trespass. The penalties for these crimes include imprisonment, which can range from one to three months, or a fine, or a combination of both.

Essential elements of Criminal Trespass

1. Entering into a property unlawfully without permission of the owner

This is the initial crucial component of creating a crime of criminal trespass, which involves unlawfully entering another person's property to harm it or result in any loss to both the property and the individual's possessions.

2. Even if entry was lawfully, but continuing to live there unlawfully:

This is the second crucial component that makes up the crime of criminal trespass. It states that if an individual enters another person's property legally with the owner's consent but then remains there without permission, it constitutes the crime of criminal trespass of property.

3. Entry or unlawfully staying there should be done with intent:

This rule indicates that if someone enters another person's property legally and begins to reside there, intending to harm or result in damage to the property, it will result in the property owner being charged with criminal trespassing.

4. The trespasser should commit an offence:

This is a basic principle of trespassing that states if someone enters another person's property, they must not damage any property, cause any loss, or steal anything valuable. This action results in the trespasser being charged with criminal trespass of property.

5. The owner of the property should be intimidated directly or indirectly:

For an act to be considered criminal trespass, it must also include the requirement that the property owner is either coerced or threatened by the intruder to acquire items that harm the property or result in a loss, thereby committing the crime of criminal trespass against the property.

Aggravated forms of Criminal Trespass

House Trespass:

Chapter 442 of the Indian Penal Code addresses the issue of unauthorized entry into a residence, stating that anyone who gains access is guilty of criminal trespass by entering a building or a home.

Lurking House-Trespass:

Chapter 443 of the IPC addresses the offence of Lurking house-trespass, indicating that an individual who unlawfully enters a residence and makes efforts to hide the property from another individual is entitled to remove or expel the intruder from the premises where the trespass occurred, thereby committing the crime of Lurking house-trespass.

Lurking House Trespass at night:

Chapter 444 of the Indian Penal Code addresses the crime of trespassing in a dwelling during the night, stating that anyone found guilty of this act has also committed the crime of trespassing in a dwelling at night.

Housebreaking:

Chapter 445 addresses the crime of breaking into a home, stating that if an individual forcibly enters a residence by damaging the door or gate, they are guilty of the crime of breaking into a home.

This can occur through: -

• A passage made by the intruder

• A passage that has never been used by anyone else

• A passage designed for breaking into homes but not meant for that purpose

• By damaging or opening any lock

• By employing criminal force to gain entry into a home

House-breaking at night:

Article 446 of the Penal Code addresses burglary during the night, indicating that any individual who unlawfully enters a residence at night is considered to have committed the crime of residential burglary during the night.

Conclusion

To sum up, breaking the law by tampering with official papers is considered one of the most severe offences in the Indian legal system, with severe penalties. The Indian Penal Code of 1860, which spans from Sections 463 to 477, deals extensively with various offences related to fake and forged official documents, including the creation and production of counterfeit documents. The Supreme Court has acknowledged the gravity of these issues regarding official documents several times, through significant rulings in well-known cases, such as The Stamp Paper Scam. The Indian Penal Code, with its extensive provisions aimed at protecting property rights, addresses offences against property. It ensures the protection of property owners and their property by covering issues like unauthorized entry onto the property.