Section 121 and 123 of IPC

Sections 121 and 123 of the IPC in Criminal Law deal with the Offences against the state. Offences against the state include the Waging of war against the State. Waging is a serious crime in India. The provisions included in the IPC punish the offender who commits an offence which directly or indirectly hinders the sovereignty and integrity of a country. The government of India takes serious actions to prevent such actions which hinder the security of the state. Ensuring the safety of the entire state is the aim of these codes. Strict penalties, such as life in prison or the death sentence, can be applied to those who violate the state to protect the state's existence. offences against the government and the state with the intent to impede national unity, public order, and tranquillity.

CLAT 2025: 10 Free Mock Tests | Legal Maxims | Landmark Judgements | PYQs

CUET BA LLB 2025:  Legal Studies ebook | 5 Free Mock Tests

MH CET LAW 2025: 10 Free Mock Tests | Legal Reasoning Practice Questions

Monthly Legal Current Affairs:  August’24 | July’24 | June’24

This Story also Contains

1. Section 121 of IPC
2. Waging of War
3. History Aspects of the Provision.
4. Provisions of Waging of War Under IPC
5. Essentials of Waging of War Against the State
6. Waging War Against the Government of India
7. Punishment For Waging of War
8. Case Laws on Waging of War
9. Conclusion

Section 121 of IPC

According to Section 121 of IPC waging, attempting to wage, or encouraging the wage of war against the Indian government. Anyone who launches an offensive against the Indian government attempts to launch one, or assists in the launch of one faces the possibility of execution or life in prison, in addition to a fine.

This section covers a variety of strategies that could be used to wage war against the government. Here, "waging war" is attacking government forces and institutions with intent and coordination; this includes both foreign and Indian individuals.

Put another way, attempts to commit public crimes with the intent to carry out criminal purposes against the state are taken into consideration in this context; the motivation behind the act is given more weight than the use of force or murder because these actions disturb the peace, national unity, and public order. Anyone who undertakes or attempts to wage war against the Indian government faces the possibility of life in jail or execution, in addition to paying a fine.

Waging of War

Fighting a war is any endeavour to use force to achieve any kind of public goal. A conflict of this type is started when a group of individuals come together to revolt against the government and use force and violence to seize any kind of public property. The goal and intention are what matter in determining whether something is considered an offence against the State, not the use of force or murder.

History Aspects of the Provision.

It was the designers of the Code who deliberately utilized the word "wages war". By executing his duty of allegiance and positioning himself in open defiance of his sovereign in the same way that a foreign enemy would after gaining strength within the realm, the expressions seem to naturally suggest the raising of arms[2]. The expression alludes to traditionally fighting wars. In English law, "waging war" is equivalent to "levying war."

This clause's original version, which made it illegal to plan against the nation, was drafted in 1870. On the subject at hand, this was the primary reform. It is unlawful to demonstrate or conspire to use criminal force against the Government of India.

In contrast, section 107 defines abetment as taking part in a conspiracy with one or more individuals to carry out an act or illegal omission that occurs both in furtherance of the Criminal Conspiracy and to carry out that act. This section does not require that any act or illegal omission occur in furtherance of any such act or omission. Put another way, conspiracy in and of itself is not illegal, except for the offences listed in section 121A.

With the passage of the Criminal Law Amendment Act in 1913, the situation was altered. It approves a piece of emergency legislation that gives India's statute of conspiracy more authority.

Provisions of Waging of War Under IPC

Section 121 of IPC

According to Section 121 of the IPC, it is unlawful to fight, attempt to wage or assist in the waging of a war against the Indian government. This section outlines the harshest punishment possible for crimes like death or life in prison. Additionally, it stipulates that items used in the commission of such a crime may be forfeited.

Section 122 of IPC

The purchase of arms, ammunition, or other materials for use in combat with the Government of India is covered under Section 122 of the Indian Penal Code. According to this clause, the maximum punishment for such crimes is life in prison. The essentials given in this section are-

• assemblage of soldiers, weapons, and ammo.

• For such collection, there must be a purpose to wage war or to prepare to wage war.

• Participation in the data collection is mandatory for the accused.

• In this fight, the enemy must be the Indian government.

Section 123 of IPC

Section 123 of the Indian Penal Code deals with concealing the identity or whereabouts of an individual found guilty of a crime under Sections 121 or 122. This clause stipulates that there could be a fine, ten years in jail or both. The essentials given under Section 123 of IPC are-

• A plan that is ready to launch an offensive against the Indian government must exist.

• The purpose of the concealment should be to enable the struggle against the Indian government.

• The person should be conscious of the concealed nature of the design.

Section 124 of IPC

Assaults against senior authorities, including the governor, President of India, and others, are covered by Section 124 of the IPC. To force or persuade the top authorities to use or refrain from exercising their official authority should be the aim of such an attack. This Section's components are:

• The defendant ought to have physically attacked the Governor or the President of any State; or

• the defendant ought to have unjustly restrained the Governor or the President; or

• The defendant made an effort to harm the President or the Governor, or improperly restrain them; or

• The accused makes an effort to use force or the appearance of force to coerce the President or the Governor into using or abstaining from using their official authority.

Section 125 of IPC

"Waging war against any Asian Power in alliance with the Government of India" is the subject of Section 125. The conduct of warfare against any Asian power is disapproved of in this section. In this case, the accused ought to have either started a war against the State, sought to start one, or assisted in starting one. The components of this section are-

• There needs to be both an international influence and an Asian state.

• This State ought not to be India.

• Such a State ought to be allied with the Indian government or moving in tandem with it.

Section 126 of IPC

"Depredation on territories of Power at peace with the Government of India" is the subject of Section 126. Attacking is referred to as depredation. This section imposes a seven-year prison sentence and a fine as punishment. It is also possible for a property that was obtained or used in the commission of this offence to be forfeited. This Section's fundamentals are-

• Depredation should have been perpetrated by the accused or planned by them.

• Any territory held by a power that is at peace or in alliance with the Indian government must be used for the act.

Section 127 of IPC

"Receiving property taken by war or depredation as mentioned in Sections 125 and 126" is the subject of Section 127. This section imposes a seven-year prison sentence and a fine as punishment. The property has to be surrendered as well. This Section's fundamentals are:

• There must have been property received by the accused.

• The property must have been obtained by the accused either by depredating Indian territory or by fighting a war with a power that is at peace with the Indian government.

Essentials of Waging of War Against the State

Active Participation in Such offences of Waging

This element comprises actively engaging in, or making an effort to engage in, acts of war against the government. Terrorism includes actions like attacking government buildings or personnel, organizing and carrying out terrorist or insurrectionary acts, and preparing to wage war against the government.

Abetment

Aiding in the commission of an offence involving the making of war against the government includes encouraging, facilitating, or providing assistance in its execution. It may mean giving material or financial support, harbouring or concealing offenders, or taking part in the planning or execution of such an offence.

Gathering or Possessing Weapons and Ammunition

Acquisition, possession, or collection of guns, ammunition, or war materials to utilize them to carry out warfare against the government: This component comprises the acquisition, possession, or collection of arms, ammunition, or war materials.

Intentions to Commit war against the State

A clear intention to overthrow the government or undermine its security, sovereignty, or territorial integrity is included in the intention to wage war against it. It must be proven that the criminal did not merely do harm or engage in illegal activities but rather meant to wage war against the government.

Waging War Against the Government of India

Sections 121 through 123 of the Code deal with declaring war on the government of India. In this context, "Government of India" refers, in a much broader sense, to the Indian State, which derives its rights and authority from the consent and will of its population. Put otherwise, this phrase means that while though the State gets its authority from Public International Laws, the people of the area own the authority and it is used by the representative government.

The following are regarded as fundamental elements of the offences under Section 121 because they must be demonstrated for the act of waging war against the Indian government to constitute an offence. To constitute an offence of Waging of War against the state the offenders must have-

• Waged War Against the State

• Has attempted to Wage War

• Has Abetted the Waging of War

• Such waging must be Against the State

Punishment For Waging of War

The punishment provided under the Indian Penal Code 1860 for the Waging War against the Government will be punished for imprisonment for a lifetime or the Death Penalty. Fines also may be imposed in some circumstances.

Case Laws on Waging of War

In the case of Barendra Kumar Ghosh v. Emperor

In this case, According to the statement, Section 121 must be drafted in a distinctive yet uncomplicated manner such that, in the ordinary sense, its scope is not necessarily limited to overt acts like gathering troops, weapons, and ammunition. It is necessary to provide evidence that any public objective intended to weaken the authority of the sovereign was attempted to be accomplished through violence. There must have been a mass rebellion in addition to force.

In the case of Tara Singh v. State of Punjab

In this instance, the court ruled that section 124A was unconstitutional due to its infringement on the right to free speech and expression as protected by Article 19(1)(a). Accordingly, it was decided that Section 124A violates the Constitution to the hilt because it attempts to silence deeply negative opinions about the government. Many proposals have been made to amend section 124A to better align with the core principles of the constitution that protect the right to free speech.

Conclusion

This article talks about the waging of war as given under the Indian Penal Code 1860. Waging War is considered a serious crime in India. Section 121 to 123 of the Indian Penal Code 1860 deals with the waging of war against the state. In a waging of war when a person conspires or abets to commit any crime against the government which somehow disturbs the peace and prosperity of the state and hinders the sovereignty and integrity of the nation.