Receiving of Stolen property

General laws about accepting stolen goods state that it is prohibited to accept or buy anything you know or suspect was obtained illegally, such as through theft. Receiving stolen property, however, is a distinct criminal offence and should not be confused with related crimes like theft, robbery, or extortion. It is illegal to accept property that one knows to be stolen. Such property could have been taken by extortion, theft, or other means. It is seen as illegal since purchasing such stuff would encourage theft, robbery, and other crimes since the thief would profit from the sale of the stolen goods.

CLAT 2025: 10 Free Mock Tests | Legal Maxims | Landmark Judgements | PYQs

CUET BA LLB 2025:  Legal Studies ebook | 5 Free Mock Tests

MH CET LAW 2025: 10 Free Mock Tests | Legal Reasoning Practice Questions

Monthly Legal Current Affairs:  August’24 | July’24 | June’24

This Story also Contains

1. Stolen Property Under IPC
2. Essential Ingredients of Stolen Property
3. Acquiring of Stolen Property
4. Various Provisions of IPC on Stolen Property
5. Case Laws on Receiving of Stolen Property
6. Conclusion

Stolen Property Under IPC

Section 410 declares any property transferred by theft, extortion, or robbery that has been unlawfully misappropriated or about which there has been a criminal breach of trust to be "stolen property," regardless of whether the transfer took place inside or outside of India. It further says that the property no longer qualifies as stolen property if it is later acquired by someone who is lawfully allowed to own it.

This illegal practice seeks to reward and incite criminal behaviour by discouraging people from purchasing or hiding stolen stuff, which in turn discourages stealing or larceny in general. Acquiring objects that have been verified as pilfered is prohibited. This property could have been obtained by any means, including theft or coercion. Therefore, it is illegal to purchase stolen goods to prevent criminals from profiting from their illicit activities. Furthermore, it prohibits anyone from concealing the fact that a piece of property was obtained illegally.

To secure a conviction for receiving stolen property, the prosecution frequently needs to prove the following elements:

• The products had to be taken before they arrived.

• A different individual than the accused burglar must deliver the goods.

• When receiving stolen property, the recipient must have known or reasonably should have known that the item in question was stolen.

• The property must have been intended to be permanently taken from the lawful owner by the receiver.

Essential Ingredients of Stolen Property

Property Should be Stolen Property

For receiving stolen property to be considered an offence under the Code, the item being received by the recipient must be stolen property. Any property that is transferred through one of the five methods listed in Section 410 is deemed to have been stolen. They are as follows-

1. By Theft

"The act of stealing," more precisely "the felonious taking and removing of personal property with intent to deprive the rightful owner of it," is what is meant by the definition of theft in a dictionary. The Indian Penal Code, 1860's Chapter 17, Offence Against Property, contains sections 378 to 460 that deal with stealing. Theft is defined legally as the taking of someone's property without the owner's permission. This definition is provided under Section 378 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC).

2. By Extortion

The Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 383, lists extortion as a theft-related offence. It comprises using threats and coercion to force a person or group to provide goods, money, or services without anticipating anything in return from the victim. The perpetrator may request that the victim transfer goods, money, or services to another individual. A key element of extortion is instilling fear in the victim of future harm, injury, or unfair restraint since it makes it possible to get valuable assets like cash, real estate, or services.

3. By Robbery

Robbery is defined as illegal behaviour that consists of stealing, extortion, and a few additional elements. It is coercing someone into giving up their belongings by the use of force, threats of force, or unwarranted restraint. Robbery is classified as a crime against property under the IPC.

4. By Criminal Misappropriation

Property misappropriation is the term used to describe the dishonest taking of another person's belongings without that person's permission. This is how Section 403 of the Indian Penal Code describes it. "Anyone who dishonestly misappropriates or converts any movable property to his use shall be punished with a fine, or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years."

5. By Criminal Breach of Trust

As per the Indian Penal Code's Section 405, an individual who is entrusted with or has dominion over any property, be it immovable or mobile, and who knowingly permits another person to do so, or who dishonestly uses it for their benefit, misappropriates it, or disposes of it against any legal contract, express or implied, that they have made regarding the discharge of that trust, is guilty of a criminal breach of trust.

Piece of Property that is Transformed or Swapped

It is not considered theft per se to obtain property through the conversion or trade of stolen goods. For instance, money obtained through the sale of stolen goods is not considered stolen property.

Acquiring of Stolen Property

A person who dishonestly collects or maintains stolen goods while knowing or having reasonable suspicion that the goods are stolen faces a maximum term of three years in prison, a fine, or both, as stated in Section 411. It is forbidden for anyone who knows or believes that the goods are stolen to receive or hold onto them. Article 411 holds both dishonest "retention" and dishonest "receipt" accountable. The distinction between the two is that, in the former case, the property was acquired through dishonest means, however, it's possible that this behaviour was not sustained. To establish the accuser's guilt, the following elements must be shown:

• The person facing charges had pilfered items while under their control.

• The property belonged to someone else before the accused took control of it.

• The accused party possessed information or reasonable suspicion that the pilfered items belonged to them.

• The defendant planned to sell the victim's possessions and keep them out of the owner's reach.

• Since this is a Section 411 cognizable offence, a warrant should be requested in the first instance. This offense is not subject to bail, and the court must give its approval before the offense can be changed. The magistrate hears the matter.

Various Provisions of IPC on Stolen Property

Section 411 IPC- Receiving Stolen Property With Knowledge

The act of receiving stolen items from someone for whatever reason does not constitute a criminal offence according to Section 411. Only when someone purchases such property knowing or having reasonable suspicion that it is stolen is the offence made punishable. When we use the word "believe," we mean that it must be proven that there were sufficient circumstances for a reasonable person to conclude that the property he is buying or dealing with is stolen.

If the accused obtained things that he was not aware were stolen, it is insufficient to prove that he was careless, that he had reason to suspect the property was stolen, or that he did not sufficiently investigate to ascertain the property's status. Whether the recipient knows who took it or not is irrelevant. Although it is not illegal to first hold such stuff, one is accountable if they keep it after learning that it was stolen.

In the case of, State of Karnataka v. Abdul Gaffar

In this case, A copper pot that held two hundred rupees was taken from the shrine. When the pot was found, it was presumed that whoever had it had stolen something. The property was valued at 600 rupees. Since it was removed from a shrine, Section 411 levied a Rs. 200 fine.

Section 412 IPC- Receiving of Property Which was Stolen Through Dacoity

Section 412 states that anyone who dishonestly receives or holds onto any stolen property whose possession, after knowing or having reason to believe, has been transferred by the commission of dacoity, or who dishonestly receives any property about which he knows or has reason to believe that it is stolen from a person whom he knows or has reason to believe to belong or to have belonged to a gang of dacoits, will be punished with life in prison or rigorous imprisonment for a term that may extend up to ten years,

.Essentials Ingredients of Section 412 IPC-

• The Property is a Stolen Property

• Such Property is linked with Dacoity

• The accused received the property through dishonest means

• The accused already knows the property being stolen through Dacoity

Section 413 IPC- Habitually Dealing with Stolen Property

According to Section 413, a person who regularly receives or deals in stolen property and has knowledge or reason to believe that the property is stolen faces a life sentence in prison or a term of imprisonment of up to ten years in either case, in addition to a fine.

Essential Ingredients of Section 413 Under IPC are-

• that the item in question was obtained through theft

• that the accused was given that item of property

• That the defendant regularly deals in such assets

• that the individual acting with knowledge or a reasonable suspicion that the item was stolen

Section 414 IPC- Dispossession of Stolen Property

The concealment and disposal of stolen items are covered in Section 414. It stipulates that anyone who knowingly aids in the concealment, disposal, or giving away of property that he knows or has reason to suspect is stolen property faces a maximum sentence of three years in either imprisonment, a fine, or both.

Essential Ingredients of Section 413 IPC-

• that the item in question was obtained through theft

• that the accused knew or had cause to suspect that the items were stolen; and

• That the defendant willingly participated in the hiding, selling, or theft of said property

Case Laws on Receiving of Stolen Property

In the case of, Nagappa Dhondiba v. State

In this case, According to the information provided by the accused, the stolen jewellery that the dead had been wearing while she was alive was found within thirty days of the deceased's death. The Court concluded that the accused could not be held liable for murder under Section 302 or for willfully causing harm during a robbery under Section 394 because there was not enough evidence to prove the accused's guilt in those situations.

In the case of, Trimbak v. State

In this case, It was not safe to assume that the accused owned the location or that the property was recovered from his possession in these circumstances because the location from where the property was taken was public and widely accessible to everyone. The fact that the goods were found on the accused's person supports the theory that someone else hid them there and told the accused where they were. However, this does not establish the accused's possession of the objects beyond a reasonable doubt. The Supreme Court acquitted the accused on the grounds mentioned above.

Conclusion

This article lays down a detailed explanation of the receipt of stolen property given under the Indian Penal Code 1860. In an offence of Stolen property, movable property is stolen without the consent of the owner of the particular property. In this case, a person receives a property with or without knowledge of the property being stolen or not. According to section 410 of the IPC, some methods through which a property is stolen are theft, extortion, Robbery, criminal misappropriation of Property and Criminal Breach of Trust. Various provisions of the IPC lays down the law for different modes of receipt of Stolen Property.