Rights and Discharge of Surety

The surety is essential in a guaranteed contract because the whole arrangement hinges on the surety he offers. The creditor has double safety in this scenario, as opposed to being entitled to payment of his debts first by the principal debtor and then losing the surety's assurance upon its expiration.

CLAT 2025: 10 Free Mock Tests | Legal Maxims | Landmark Judgements | PYQs

CUET BA LLB 2025:  Legal Studies ebook | 5 Free Mock Tests

MH CET LAW 2025: 10 Free Mock Tests | Legal Reasoning Practice Questions

Monthly Legal Current Affairs:  August’24 | July’24 | June’24

This Story also Contains

1. Meaning of Contract of Guarantee
2. Essentials of Contract of Guarantee
3. Who is Surety?
4. Rights of Surety
5. Discharge of Surety
6. Conditions for Discharge of Surety
7. Case Laws on Rights and Discharge of Surety
8. Conclusion

This places the creditor in a more secure and solid position in terms of getting paid. The surety bears a widespread obligation to settle the major debtor's outstanding amounts, regardless of whether they benefited directly from the initial agreement between the principle debtor and the creditor. Because of the nature of the agreement, the guarantor is entitled to certain legal rights while under a contract of surety. These rights also apply to the creditor and main debtor, as well as additional co-sureties. The project discusses the surety's several rights.

Meaning of Contract of Guarantee

The Indian Contract Act of 1872, Section 126, defines what a contract of guarantee is. The simplest definition of a "contract of guarantee" is an assurance and a legally enforceable agreement.

Three parties to a contract are involved in the Contract of Guarantee. In a sense, a person who is referred to as a creditor lends money to another person who needs money, referred to as the principal debtor, along with someone who assures that the money will be returned to the creditor either by the principal debtor or if he defaults by the guarantor or surety.

Essentials of Contract of Guarantee

Parties associated with the Contract

A guarantee can only be given by a three-party contract. There are three parties involved: the creditor, the surety, and the primary debtor. About a loan taken out by the principal debtor from a creditor secured by a surety.

Surety’s Role

The surety is purchased in the contract in the same capacity as a person who guarantees the principal debtor will pay the amount; however, if the principal debtor defaults, the creditor may request payment of the debt amount from the surety. The crucial thing to remember in this situation is that the creditor can only request that the surety pay off his debt if the principal debtor fails to do so.

Involvement of Consideration

Contract law has long recognized the rule that a deal may only be considered legally binding if there is consideration involved. Regarding the consideration as part of surety, Section 127 of the Indian Contract Act, of 1872 made it clear that any benefit received by the principal debtor may be deemed to be for the surety to provide the guarantee.

The Contract Should be Valid

When determining whether a contract is legitimate, there are a few things to consider. To engage in a contract, there needs to be an offer made with legal consideration by both parties, and the parties must be at least eighteen years old and provide their free agreement.

All Facts must be Communicated

It is necessary to provide the surety with complete information regarding the terms of the contract being executed. The creditor or principal debtor may not withhold any information about the guarantee contract.

Existence of Debt

Any debt of any type must be included in the contract. If there is no debt, there can be no guaranteed contract. The promise to repay the unpaid money must have come from the surety or the principal debtor.

Who is Surety?

A surety is a person who takes on the guarantee that the principal debtor will pay back the money. A guarantor is another term for a surety. The creditor may request repayment from the surety if the principal debtor defaults on the loan.

Rights of Surety

Rights Against Creditor

Right to Securities with the Creditor

The right of the surety to receive a portion of the security held throughout the execution of the contract of guarantee is stated in Section 141 of the Indian Contract Act, of 1872. In terms of security, the surety's position is identical to the creditor's. A creditor is required to disclose the security to the surety; it makes no difference if the surety knows about the security or not. The surety is entitled to a share if the principal debtor defaults on the payment and the surety has satisfied all outstanding debts.

Loss of Securities without the negligence of the Creditor

In this scenario, in the event of a payment default, the creditor seizes the principal debtor's security. The right of set-off concerning the security value from the principal debtor's obligation belongs to the surety.

Rights Against the Principal Debtor

Subrogation Rights

Section 140 of the Indian Contract Act of 1872 delineates the subrogation privilege. The subrogation right is the creation of a new contract to collect the debt from the parties. The surety has settled the amount due since the principal debtor went into default. The major debtor now has the right to repay the surety, who was the creditor in the first guarantee contract, for the sum repaid. The surety now acts as the creditor.

Indemnity Rights

The Indian Contract Act of 1872 mentions indemnifying the surety under Section 145. "To indemnify" refers to a party's obligation to reimburse another party for losses incurred as a result of the promisor's performance. Under the terms of the Contract of Guarantee, the principal debtor is required to compensate the surety for any payment defaults at the time the loan balance is discharged. The indemnity provisions are an implied obligation of the major debtor in the event of payment default; they do not need to be stated in the contract.

Securities Received by the Creditor after Contract of Guarantee

The right of surety in the security specified in the contract of guarantee is referenced in Section 141 of the Indian Contract Act, of 1872. If the principle debtor defaults on the loan and the surety makes the payment, the surety is entitled to security benefits. In this scenario, the surety may be released if the money is being taken out of security.

Rights of Surety against Co-Sureties

Co-Surety’s Right to Get Release from the Contract

According to Section 138 of the Indian Contract Act of 1872, a surety's release from liability does not release the other sureties from their obligations. Here, "co-sureties" refers to a situation in which multiple sureties provide a guarantee or assume responsibility for the principal debtor's payment. According to Section 138, if the creditor requests only one surety to fulfil his obligation and the principal debtor defaults on the loan. In this situation, the surety may request that the other sureties fulfil their obligations.

Co-Sureties are entitled to Contribute Equally

The Indian Contract Act of 1872 states in Section 146 that co-securities have joint liabilities. It must be assumed that all co-securities will equally share any debt not paid by the principal debtor if the contract does not specifically state that co-securities are liable jointly.

Co-Surities Entitled to pay the amount as promised

According to Section 147, if the primary debtor defaults on the loan, the co-securities are required to reimburse the major debtor if they have pledged to pay a specific amount toward the total debt.

Discharge of Surety

The Indian Contract Act of 1872 specifies that a guarantor may be relieved from liability under certain circumstances. A surety is released from liability when they are no longer required to honour their commitment if the principal debtor defaults.

Conditions for Discharge of Surety

A surety may be released from his obligation under three main conditions. The situation is as follows:

Discharge of Surety by Revocation

By way of Notice

Revocation of a continuing guarantee, or a guarantee for a sequence of transactions, is permitted by Section 130 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, upon notification to the creditor. A specific assurance, however, cannot be withdrawn if the contract has already been executed.

A continuous assurance can only be withdrawn for future transactions by filing a notice, according to an analysis of Section 130. As for already completed transactions, the surety is still accountable. Since there are no pending future transactions, this explains why the section does not include the revocation of a specific guarantee. If there is no contract to the contrary, the notification to the creditor should be delivered at any time and should be explicit and obvious in that it states the purpose of terminating liability for future transactions.

By Death

According to Section 131 of the Indian Contract Act of 1872, the surety's liability is released in the event of the surety's demise. According to the interpretation of Section 131, the surety is discharged upon the surety's death. The surety is released from any further agreements.

If the transactions for which the surety made the guarantee have already taken place, then the surety's legal heirs are required to complete them. The legal heirs cannot be held personally accountable for the surety's debts; rather, their liability is limited to the amount of property they inherit. In addition, no clause that conflicts with this section may be included in the contract.

Discharge of Surety by Conduct of Party

Terms of Contract Changed

In the case that the terms of the contract are materially altered or varied, a surety's liability may be released under Section 133 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

The clause implies that a surety may be released from liability if a contract is altered without the surety's approval, particularly when the contract is a continuous contract of assurance. The materiality of the deviation is the primary criterion that determines when the surety will be released. Whether the variance is important will depend on the court's consideration of all the facts. The court may use its discretion to decide whether the variance is important if it helps the surety.

Performance of Contract of Guarantee

Section 134 of the Indian Contract Act, of 1872 states that if the principal debtor pays the loan and fulfils his promise, the surety will be released from his obligation and the guarantee contract will be signed.

Mere Compromise

The surety is released from the contract in this scenario because, per Section 135 of the Indian Contract Act of 1872, the creditor grants the principal debtor an extension of time to pay the loan amount and guarantees that he won't sue the debtor for it.

Discharge of Surety by Invalidation of Contract of Guarantee

Contracts Executed Through Misrepresentation

Section 142 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 states that a contract is void if the creditor made it by withholding important information from the parties or by misrepresenting its terms. It won't be subject to legal enforcement. The contract is deemed void if the surety is provided with misleading information or misrepresented facts, and the surety bases its guarantee on these misrepresentations. Consequently, the surety is released from any obligation under the guarantee.

Contracts Entered Through Concealing Facts

Concealing information is the act of one party not disclosing facts that would have affected the other party's decision to sign a contract. Section 143 of the Indian Contract Act deals with situations where a guarantee is obtained via deceit.

If the creditor conceals material facts from the surety that would have persuaded the guarantor to provide the guarantee, the contract is considered null and unenforceable. The assurance absolves the surety of any responsibility.

Unless Co-Sureties Consent to a Contract.

According to Section 144 of the Indian Contract Act of 1872, a contract cannot be enforced unless a contract of guarantee is signed by the other co-sureties.

Case Laws on Rights and Discharge of Surety

In the case of, Sita Ram Gupta v. Punjab National Bank

In this instance, the appellant attempted to revoke the guarantee before the funds were released to the principal debtor. However, a clause in the guarantee agreement specified that the guarantee is indefinite and non-terminable. The appellant had given up his right to withdraw the contract, according to the court, hence he was unable to do so.

In the case of Kahiba Bin Narsapa Nikade v. Narshiv Sheipat

In this case, According to the High Court of Bombay, a guarantor to a bond issued by a minor for funds borrowed for legal proceedings but deemed not essential may be sued depending on whether the kid's contract is deemed void or voidable. The court found no justification for a person to enter into a contract that would require a third party to undertake an imperfectly obligated duty. The surety's contract is a main contract rather than collateral if the obligation is void.

Conclusion

The release of a surety from obligation under a guarantee is one of the most crucial components of contract law that upholds equality and fairness in business agreements. Certain provisions in the Indian Contract Act of 1872 allow a guarantor to be relieved from liability under many circumstances, such as the release of the principal debtor, the renunciation of the guarantee, and contract changes. The aforementioned clauses protect the surety's rights from foreseeable obligations.