Geostationary and polar satellites

Geostationary and polar satellites

Edited By Vishal kumar | Updated on Jul 02, 2025 07:47 PM IST

Satellites play a crucial role in modern life, enabling everything from global communication to weather forecasting. Two primary types of satellites are geostationary and polar satellites, each serving distinct purposes. Geostationary satellites remain fixed above a specific point on Earth, orbiting at the same rotational speed as the planet. This allows them to provide continuous coverage over a large area, making them essential for broadcasting, GPS, and meteorology. On the other hand, polar satellites orbit the Earth from pole to pole, covering the entire surface over time. They are invaluable for environmental monitoring and scientific research, capturing high-resolution images of every part of the globe. Just like surveillance cameras watching over specific locations or drones flying over large areas to gather data, these satellites help us stay connected and informed about global events and natural phenomena.

This Story also Contains
  1. Geostationary Satellite
  2. Polar Satellite
  3. Solved Examples Based on Geostationary and Polar Satellites
  4. Summary
Geostationary and polar satellites
Geostationary and polar satellites

Geostationary Satellite

A satellite which appears stationary relative to the Earth is called a geostationary or geosynchronous satellite.

A geostationary satellite will stay the same place above the earth always, such a satellite is never at rest. Geostationary satellites appear stationary due to their zero relative velocity with respect to their place on Earth.

It is also known as parking orbit.

Now, you can say that the time period of the geostationary satellite is also 24 hours or 86400 sec.

So $\mathrm{T}=24$ hours or 86400 sec.
and we know that the Height of the Satellite is given by

$
h=\left(\frac{T^2 g R^2}{4 \pi^2}\right)^{\frac{1}{3}}-R
$

So putting $\mathrm{T}=24$ hours or 86400 sec.
We get the height of geostationary satellite from the surface of the earth

$
\text { as } h=6 R=36000 \mathrm{~km}
$

Its sense of rotation should be the same as that of Earth about its own axis. l.e., in an anti-clockwise direction (from west to east).
A geostationary satellite is used for telecommunication, weather forecasting, etc.

Polar Satellite

A polar satellite is a satellite whose orbit is perpendicular or at right angles to the equator. or in simple words, it passes over the north and south poles as it orbits the earth. It can also be used as a communication satellite for countries/areas near the poles where Geostationary satellites have no / Poor coverage.

Recommended Topic Video

Solved Examples Based on Geostationary and Polar Satellites

Example 1: Which one of the following statements regarding geostationary satellites of the earth is incorrect?

1) It should revolve in an orbit concentric and coplanar with the equatorial plane

2) The time period of revolution is 16 hours.

3) The height of the geostationary satellite from the centre of the earth is 42400km.

4) The orbital velocity of a geostationary satellite is 3.08km/s.

Solution:

geostationary satellite

Satellites that appear stationary relative to Earth are geostationary satellites, also known as communication satellites or geosynchronous satellites

The period of revolution is the same as the revolution of the earth, T = 24hrs.

The height of a geostationary satellite from the earth's centre is 4200km. and the Orbital velocity of a geostationary satellite is 3.08km/s.

Hence, the answer is the option (2)

Example 2: A geostationary satellite has always to be at an altitude of (in kilometres) :

1) 36000

2) 24000

3) 30000

4) 20000

Solution:

As we know, the time period

Geostationary and polar satellites are given by
$
T=2 \pi \sqrt{\frac{r^3}{G M}}=2 \pi \sqrt{\frac{(R+h)^3}{g R^2}}
$
By squaring and rearranging both sides

$
\begin{aligned}
& \frac{g R^2 T^2}{4 \pi^2}=(R+h)^3 \\
\Rightarrow & h=\left(\frac{T^2 g R^2}{4 \pi^2}\right)^{1 / 3}-R
\end{aligned}
$
So, put the value, $T=24 h=24 \times 60 \times 60=86400 s$

$
\begin{aligned}
& R=\text { Radius of the earth }=6400 \mathrm{~km} \\
& g=9.8 \times 10^{-3} \mathrm{~km} / \mathrm{s}^2
\end{aligned}
$
Substituting these values in the equation of the formula of height, we get-

$
h=(42400-6400) \mathrm{km}=36000 \mathrm{~km}
$

Hence, the answer is the option (1).

Example 3: Given the radius of earth ‘R’ and the length of a day ‘T’, the height of a geostationary satellite is [G = gravitational constant, M = mass of the earth]

1) $\left(\frac{4 \pi^2 G M}{T^2}\right)^{\frac{1}{3}}$
2) $\left(\frac{4 \pi G M}{T^2}\right)^{\frac{1}{3}}-R$
3) $\left(\frac{G M T^2}{4 \pi^2}\right)^{\frac{1}{3}}-R$
4) $\left(\frac{G M T^2}{4 \pi^2}\right)+R$

Solution:

The height of geostationary satellites from the surface of the Earth is $h=6 R=36000 \mathrm{Km}$

$
\begin{aligned}
T & =2 \pi \sqrt{\frac{r^3}{G M}} \\
T & =2 \pi \sqrt{\frac{(r+h)^3}{G M}} \\
h & =\left(\frac{G M T^2}{4 \pi^2}\right)^{\frac{1}{3}}-R
\end{aligned}
$

Hence, the answer is the option (3).

Example 4: A satellite of mass M is in a circular orbit of radius R about the centre of the Earth. A meteorite of the same mass, falling towards the earth, collides with the satellite completely inelastically. The speeds of the satellite and the meteorite are the same, just before the collision. The subsequent motion of the combined body will be :

1) in an elliptical orbit

2) such that it escapes to infinity

3) in a circular orbit of a different radius

4) in the same circular orbit of radius R

Solution:

The shape of the orbit of the satellite

If $V<V_o$, then the satellite does not remain in its circular path rather it traces a spiral path and falls on the earth

$
V=V_e
$

satellite move along a parabolic path
wherein

$
V=V_o
$
Satellite revolves in a circular path

$
V>V_e
$

Satellite will move along a hyperbolic path

Apply momentum conservation

$\begin{aligned} & m V \hat{l}-m V \hat{j}=2 m \rightarrow \overrightarrow{V_2} \\ & V_2=\frac{1}{2} \times \sqrt{2} V_0=\frac{V_0}{2} \\ & \text { So }_2<V_0<\sqrt{\frac{G M}{R}}\end{aligned}$

So it will move in an elliptical orbit

Hence, the answer is the option (1).

Summary

Geostationary satellites orbit at 36,000 km above Earth, remaining fixed over one location, making them ideal for continuous communication, broadcasting, and weather monitoring. Polar satellites, however, orbit from pole to pole, covering the entire globe and providing crucial data for environmental monitoring and scientific research. Both satellite types play vital roles in connecting and informing us about global events and natural phenomena.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What is a geostationary satellite?
A geostationary satellite is a satellite that orbits Earth at the same speed as the planet's rotation, allowing it to remain fixed above a specific point on the equator. This unique orbit occurs at an altitude of approximately 35,786 km above Earth's surface and has a period of exactly 24 hours, matching Earth's rotational period.
2. Why are geostationary satellites always positioned above the equator?
Geostationary satellites must be positioned above the equator because this is the only location where their orbital plane can align with Earth's rotational axis. This alignment allows the satellite to match Earth's rotational speed and appear stationary relative to a fixed point on the ground.
3. What is the main advantage of using geostationary satellites for communication?
The main advantage of geostationary satellites for communication is their fixed position relative to Earth. This allows ground-based antennas to remain pointed at a single spot in the sky, simplifying the design and operation of Earth stations and enabling continuous, uninterrupted communication with a large area of the planet.
4. What is the coverage area of a single geostationary satellite?
A single geostationary satellite can cover approximately one-third of Earth's surface, excluding the polar regions. This large coverage area is due to the satellite's high altitude, which allows its signals to reach a significant portion of the planet. However, the curvature of Earth limits visibility near the poles.
5. What is the significance of the geostationary orbit's altitude of 35,786 km?
The altitude of 35,786 km is significant because it's the only altitude at which a satellite can maintain a geostationary orbit. At this specific height, the satellite's orbital period matches Earth's rotational period of 24 hours, allowing it to remain fixed above a point on the equator. This altitude is a result of the balance between Earth's gravitational force and the centripetal force required for the satellite's circular orbit.
6. How does a polar satellite differ from a geostationary satellite?
A polar satellite orbits Earth from pole to pole, passing over the entire surface of the planet as it rotates beneath. Unlike geostationary satellites, polar satellites have a much lower altitude (typically 700-800 km) and shorter orbital periods (about 100 minutes). They do not stay fixed over one location but provide coverage of the entire globe over time.
7. How do polar satellites provide global coverage?
Polar satellites achieve global coverage by orbiting Earth from pole to pole while the planet rotates beneath them. As Earth turns, the satellite's path shifts westward with each orbit, allowing it to pass over different areas. Over time, this combination of the satellite's orbit and Earth's rotation enables the satellite to observe or communicate with every part of the planet.
8. Why do geostationary satellites have a much higher altitude than polar satellites?
Geostationary satellites have a much higher altitude (about 35,786 km) than polar satellites (typically 700-800 km) because they need to match Earth's rotational period of 24 hours. According to Kepler's laws of planetary motion, this specific orbital period is only possible at this higher altitude, where the satellite's orbital velocity precisely matches Earth's rotational speed.
9. Why can't geostationary satellites provide good coverage for polar regions?
Geostationary satellites cannot provide good coverage for polar regions because they orbit above the equator. The curvature of Earth obstructs the line of sight between the satellite and locations near the poles. As you move towards higher latitudes, the geostationary satellite appears lower in the sky, eventually dropping below the horizon in polar regions.
10. How does the orbital velocity of a geostationary satellite compare to that of a polar satellite?
The orbital velocity of a geostationary satellite is much lower than that of a polar satellite. Geostationary satellites travel at about 3.07 km/s, which matches Earth's rotational speed at the equator. Polar satellites, being much closer to Earth, orbit at higher speeds of about 7.5 km/s to maintain their orbit against stronger gravitational pull.
11. What is the significance of the "critical inclination" in satellite orbits, and how does it relate to geostationary and polar satellites?
The critical inclination (about 63.4° or 116.6°) is an orbital inclination where the satellite's argument of perigee remains constant due to Earth's oblateness. While not directly applicable to geostationary (0° inclination) or polar (near 90° inclination) orbits, understanding critical inclination helps in designing orbits that minimize fuel consumption for certain types of missions, bridging the gap between equatorial and polar orbits.
12. How do the orbits of geostationary and polar satellites affect their energy requirements?
Geostationary satellites require more energy to reach their higher orbits (35,786 km) but need less energy for station-keeping once in position. Polar satellites need less initial energy to reach their lower orbits (700-800 km) but require more frequent adjustments due to atmospheric drag and other perturbations, resulting in higher ongoing energy needs for maintaining their orbits.
13. What is the Clarke Belt, and why is it important for geostationary satellites?
The Clarke Belt, named after science fiction author Arthur C. Clarke, is the ring-shaped region in space at an altitude of 35,786 km above Earth's equator where geostationary satellites orbit. It's important because it's the only location where satellites can maintain a geostationary orbit, making it a valuable and limited resource for satellite communications and Earth observation.
14. How does the time delay in communication differ between geostationary and polar satellites?
Geostationary satellites have a longer communication delay (about 240 milliseconds round trip) due to their higher altitude. Polar satellites, being much closer to Earth, have shorter delays (typically less than 20 milliseconds). This difference can be significant for applications requiring real-time communication or low latency.
15. Why are polar satellites often used for Earth observation and weather monitoring?
Polar satellites are preferred for Earth observation and weather monitoring because their orbits allow them to pass over every part of Earth's surface regularly. This global coverage, combined with their lower altitude, enables them to capture high-resolution images and collect detailed data about Earth's atmosphere, oceans, and land surfaces.
16. How does the launch process differ for geostationary and polar satellites?
Launching a geostationary satellite requires more fuel and a more complex trajectory than a polar satellite. Geostationary satellites are first placed in a low Earth orbit, then use a transfer orbit to reach their final position. Polar satellites can be placed directly into their intended orbit. The launch site latitude also differs, with equatorial launch sites preferred for geostationary satellites to minimize fuel requirements.
17. What is the concept of "station-keeping" for satellites, and how does it differ between geostationary and polar orbits?
Station-keeping refers to the process of maintaining a satellite's intended orbit and position. For geostationary satellites, this involves small, regular adjustments to counteract gravitational pulls from the Moon, Sun, and Earth's equatorial bulge. Polar satellites require more frequent adjustments due to atmospheric drag and variations in Earth's gravitational field, especially when maintaining a precise repeating ground track.
18. How do geostationary and polar satellites complement each other in global communication systems?
Geostationary and polar satellites complement each other by addressing different communication needs. Geostationary satellites provide constant coverage over large areas, making them ideal for broadcasting and long-distance communication. Polar satellites offer global coverage, including polar regions, and are useful for mobile communications, data relay, and applications requiring lower latency.
19. What is the concept of "look angle" for satellite communication, and how does it differ for geostationary and polar satellites?
The look angle is the elevation angle from the horizon to the satellite as seen from a ground station. For geostationary satellites, the look angle remains constant but varies with latitude, becoming lower as you move away from the equator. For polar satellites, the look angle constantly changes as the satellite moves across the sky, requiring tracking antennas for continuous communication.
20. How does the Doppler effect impact communications with geostationary versus polar satellites?
The Doppler effect, which causes a change in frequency of a signal due to relative motion, is negligible for geostationary satellites because they appear stationary relative to Earth. However, it significantly affects communications with polar satellites due to their rapid movement across the sky, requiring frequency adjustments in ground equipment to maintain clear communication.
21. Why are some satellites placed in Molniya orbits, and how do these compare to geostationary and polar orbits?
Molniya orbits are highly elliptical orbits used to provide coverage to high latitude regions that geostationary satellites can't reach effectively. They have long dwell times over these regions, similar to geostationary satellites, but also provide global coverage like polar satellites. Molniya orbits are a compromise between the continuous coverage of geostationary orbits and the global reach of polar orbits.
22. How does atmospheric drag affect geostationary and polar satellites differently?
Atmospheric drag has a negligible effect on geostationary satellites due to their high altitude where the atmosphere is extremely thin. Polar satellites, orbiting at much lower altitudes, experience significant atmospheric drag, which gradually decreases their orbital altitude and requires periodic boosts to maintain their orbit.
23. What is the concept of "orbital inclination," and how does it differ for geostationary and polar satellites?
Orbital inclination is the angle between the orbital plane of a satellite and Earth's equatorial plane. Geostationary satellites have an inclination of 0°, meaning they orbit directly above the equator. Polar satellites have an inclination close to 90°, allowing them to pass over the poles. This difference in inclination is fundamental to the distinct characteristics and applications of these satellite types.
24. How do solar panels on geostationary and polar satellites differ in their design and operation?
Solar panels on geostationary satellites can be fixed, always facing the Sun, due to the satellite's stable position. Polar satellites, however, require more complex solar panel systems that can rotate or are distributed around the satellite body to ensure consistent power generation as the satellite's orientation to the Sun constantly changes during its orbit.
25. What is the significance of the "analemma" in understanding geostationary satellite positions?
The analemma, a figure-eight pattern that represents the Sun's position in the sky at a fixed time throughout the year, is relevant to geostationary satellites because it illustrates the slight variations in their apparent position due to Earth's elliptical orbit and axial tilt. Understanding the analemma helps in precise satellite tracking and communication adjustments.
26. How does the concept of "orbital period" apply differently to geostationary and polar satellites?
The orbital period of a geostationary satellite is exactly 24 hours, matching Earth's rotational period. This synchronization keeps the satellite fixed over one point on Earth. Polar satellites have much shorter orbital periods, typically around 100 minutes, allowing them to circle Earth multiple times a day and provide global coverage.
27. What is the "midnight sun" phenomenon, and how does it affect polar satellites differently from geostationary satellites?
The "midnight sun" phenomenon, where the Sun remains visible for 24 hours in polar regions during summer, affects polar satellites by providing continuous solar power. This is advantageous for their operation but can cause thermal management challenges. Geostationary satellites, being over the equator, are not affected by this phenomenon and experience more consistent day-night cycles.
28. How do geostationary and polar satellites differ in their vulnerability to space debris?
Polar satellites, orbiting at lower altitudes, are more vulnerable to collisions with space debris due to the higher density of objects in low Earth orbit. Geostationary satellites face less risk from debris but are more susceptible to interference from other satellites in the crowded geostationary belt.
29. What is the concept of "ground track," and how does it differ for geostationary and polar satellites?
The ground track is the path traced by a satellite on Earth's surface. Geostationary satellites have a stationary ground track, appearing as a single point on the equator. Polar satellites have a constantly moving ground track that covers the entire globe, typically repeating every few days, which is crucial for their global coverage capabilities.
30. How does the gravitational influence of the Moon and Sun affect geostationary and polar satellites differently?
Geostationary satellites are more significantly affected by the gravitational pull of the Moon and Sun due to their higher altitude. These forces cause orbital perturbations that require regular station-keeping maneuvers. Polar satellites, being closer to Earth, are less affected by these celestial bodies but more influenced by Earth's non-uniform gravitational field.
31. What is the concept of "orbital decay," and why is it more relevant to polar satellites than geostationary ones?
Orbital decay refers to the gradual decrease in a satellite's orbital altitude due to atmospheric drag and other factors. It's more relevant to polar satellites because they orbit in the upper atmosphere where drag is significant. Geostationary satellites, orbiting far above the atmosphere, experience negligible orbital decay, allowing them to maintain their position for much longer periods without adjustment.
32. How do the radiation environments differ for geostationary and polar satellites, and what implications does this have for their design?
Geostationary satellites operate in the outer Van Allen radiation belt, experiencing high levels of energetic particles. Polar satellites pass through the auroral zones and polar cusps, encountering variable radiation environments. These different radiation exposures require specific shielding and electronic designs to ensure long-term operation and reliability in their respective orbits.
33. What is the concept of "sun-synchronous orbit," and how does it relate to polar satellites?
A sun-synchronous orbit is a nearly polar orbit where the satellite passes over any given point on Earth's surface at the same local solar time. This is achieved by carefully selecting the orbital inclination and altitude. Many Earth observation satellites use sun-synchronous orbits to ensure consistent lighting conditions for imaging, which is not possible with geostationary satellites.
34. How do the fuel requirements for orbit insertion and maintenance differ between geostationary and polar satellites?
Geostationary satellites require more fuel for initial orbit insertion due to the higher altitude and need for precise positioning. However, they need less fuel for long-term station-keeping. Polar satellites use less fuel for initial orbit insertion but may require more over time for drag compensation and maintaining precise orbits, especially for Earth observation missions.
35. How do the thermal control systems differ for geostationary and polar satellites?
Thermal control systems for geostationary satellites are designed to handle more consistent heat loads due to their fixed orientation relative to the Sun. Polar satellites require more dynamic thermal management systems to cope with rapid transitions between sunlight and Earth's shadow, as well as varying heat loads from Earth as they orbit.
36. What is the concept of "yaw steering," and why is it more relevant to polar satellites than geostationary ones?
Yaw steering is a technique used to optimize a satellite's orientation relative to its orbital velocity and the Sun. It's more relevant to polar satellites, especially those in sun-synchronous orbits, to maintain optimal solar panel orientation and instrument pointing. Geostationary satellites, with their fixed position relative to Earth, generally don't require this technique.
37. How does the concept of "orbital resonance" apply differently to geostationary and polar satellites?
Orbital resonance occurs when orbital periods of different objects are related by a ratio of small integers. Geostationary satellites are in a 1:1 resonance with Earth's rotation. This resonance is crucial for their function but can also lead to clustering of space debris at certain longitudes. Polar satellites generally don't utilize orbital resonances with Earth's rotation but may have resonances with each other for constellation design.
38. What is the "South Atlantic Anomaly," and how does it affect polar satellites differently from geostationary ones?
The South Atlantic Anomaly is a region where Earth's inner Van Allen radiation belt comes closest to the planet's surface. Polar satellites passing through this area experience increased radiation exposure, potentially affecting their electronics and requiring additional shielding or operational adjustments. Geostationary satellites, due to their higher altitude and equatorial position, are not directly affected by this phenomenon.
39. How do the communication frequencies typically used by geostationary and polar satellites differ, and why?
Geostationary satellites often use higher frequencies (C, Ku, Ka bands) to achieve higher data rates over their fixed coverage areas. Polar satellites frequently use lower frequencies (VHF, UHF, L-band) to penetrate the atmosphere more easily and maintain communication despite constantly changing positions. The choice of frequencies also depends on specific mission requirements and international frequency allocations.
40. What is the concept of "orbital precession," and how does it affect geostationary and polar satellites differently?
Orbital precession is the gradual change in the orientation of an orbit's ellipse in its plane. For geostationary satellites, precession effects are minimal due to their equatorial orbit. Polar satellites, especially those in sun-synchronous orbits, utilize precession caused by Earth's oblateness to maintain their sun-synchronous characteristics. Understanding and managing precession is crucial for maintaining the
Weightlessness

02 Jul'25 07:47 PM

Mass And Density Of Earth

02 Jul'25 07:14 PM

Orbital Velocity

02 Jul'25 07:03 PM

Work Done Against Gravity

02 Jul'25 07:02 PM

Gravitational Potential

02 Jul'25 07:02 PM

Escape Velocity

02 Jul'25 07:02 PM

Acceleration Due To Gravity

02 Jul'25 06:23 PM

Articles

Back to top