Resonance Column Method

Resonance Column Method

Vishal kumarUpdated on 02 Jul 2025, 06:18 PM IST

The Resonance Column Method is a fascinating experimental technique used in physics to determine the speed of sound in air. This method involves creating standing waves in a column of air, typically within a cylindrical tube, by adjusting the length of the air column and observing the points where resonance occurs. In real life, the principles of resonance can be seen in musical instruments like flutes or organ pipes, where the length of the air column determines the pitch of the sound produced. Just as a musician adjusts the length of a flute to create different notes, the Resonance Column Method allows us to explore the relationship between the physical properties of a medium and the speed of sound through it. By understanding this concept, we can appreciate how sound travels through different environments, from the strings of a guitar to the echo in a canyon.

This Story also Contains

  1. Resonance Column Method
  2. Solved Examples Based on Resonance Column Method
  3. Summary
Resonance Column Method
Resonance Column Method

Resonance Column Method

The Resonance Column Method is an important experimental technique in physics used to determine the speed of sound in air. This method involves using a vertical cylindrical tube partially filled with water, where sound waves are introduced at the open end. By adjusting the length of the air column above the water level, resonance occurs at specific points, allowing the measurement of the wavelength and, subsequently, the speed of sound.

In this, the equipment used is a resonance tube. This apparatus is used to determine the velocity of sound in air and to compare the frequency of two turning forks.

It is a closed organ pipe with a variable length of air column. When we brought a turning fork near it, its air column vibrated with the frequency of the fork. The length of the air column varied until the frequency of the fork and the air column became equal. When frequency becomes equal, the column resonates and the note becomes loud.

It is the full setup of the resonance tube. If a tuning fork of known frequency no is struck on a rubber pad and brought near the open end. Because of this, the air column starts oscillating. This air column behaves as a closed organ pipe and the water level is a closed end. We decrease the water level gradually and as the water level reaches a position where there is a node of the corresponding stationary wave, in the air column, resonance takes place. At this place intensity of sound will be maximum.

Let at this position the length of the air column is l1. By further decreasing water level again after some distance maximum intensity of sound is obtained where the node is obtained. Let this level be l2.

If the length of the first and second resonance, then

l1+e=λ4 and l2+e=3λ4 so, λ=2(l2l1)

Speed of sound in air at room temperature v=nλ=2n(l2l1)

Also,

l2+el1+e=3l2=3l1+2e

So, the second resonance is obtained at a length more than thrice the length of the first resonance.

Recommended Topic Video

Solved Examples Based on Resonance Column Method

Example 1: In a resonance tube experiment when the tube is filled with water up to a height of 17.0 cm from the bottom, it resonates with a given tuning fork. When the water level is raised the next resonance with the same tuning fork occurs at a height of 24.5 cm. If the velocity of sound in air is 330 m/s, the tuning fork frequency is :

1) 2200 Hz
2) 550 Hz
3) 1100 Hz
4) 3300 Hz

Solution:

Lh1=nλ2+λ4 Lh2=(n1)λ2+λ4λ2=h2h1=24.517.0=7.5 cmλ=15 cmu=fλf=2200 Hz

Hence, the answer is the option (1).

Example 2: The first overtone frequency of an open organ pipe is equal to the fundamental frequency of a closed organ pipe. If the length of the closed organ pipe is 20 cm. The length of the open organ pipe is __________cm.

1)80

2)60

3)70

4)100

Solution:

For open organ pipes,
fn=nv2l(1)

For closed organ pipe
fn=(2n1)v4l(2)

For the first overtone of an open organ pipe
n=2(2nd mode )f1=2v2l1 (3)

Fundamental frequency of closed organ pipe, n=1
f2=v4l2(4)f1=f2 (Given) 2v2l1=v4l2l1=4l2=4(20)=80 cm

The length of the open organ pipe is 80 cm.

Hence, the answer is the option (1).

Example 3: In an experiment to determine the velocity of sound in air at room temperature using a resonance tube, the first resonance is observed when the air column has a length of 20.0 cm for a tuning fork of frequency 400 Hz. The velocity of the sound at room temperature is 336 ms1. The third resonance is observed when the air column has a length of ________cm

1) 104

2) 300

3) 750

4) 3456

Solution:

400=V4( L1+e)(i)400=5 V4( L2+e)(ii)L1+e=λ4=21 cm L2+e=5λ4=105 cme=1 cm, L2=104 cm

Hence, the answer is the option (1).

Example 4: A tuning fork is vibrating at 250 Hz The length of the shortest closed organ pipe that will resonate with the tuning fork will be _______cm. (Take the speed of sound in air as 340 ms1)

1) 34cm

2) 35cm

3) 36cm

4) 33cm

Solution:

f=250 Hz

For the shortest closed organ pipe

l=λ4λ=4l

At resonance,
forgan pipe =ftuning fork Vλ=2503404(l)=250l=340×103l=0.34 ml=34 cm

Hence, the answer is the option (1).

Example 5: In Quicks tube was employed and a tuning fork of frequency 1328 Hz was used. Initially, it was on max intensity. Later when the slider tube was drawn by a distance of 12.5 cm, the intensity was found maximum for the first time. Find the speed of sound in the air

1) 332 m/s

2) 330 m/s

3) 336 m/s

4) 328 m/s

Solution:

Quinck's tube

This is an apparatus used to demonstrate the phenomena of interference and also to measure the velocity of sound in air.

wherein

x=λ2V=2ν0xν0= frequency double path means =25 cmλ=25 cmv=1328×25 cm=332 m/s

Hence, the answer is the option (1).

Summary

The Resonance Column Method is a fundamental experimental technique in physics used to measure the speed of sound in air. By creating standing waves in a variable-length air column, this method demonstrates the principles of resonance, much like how musical instruments produce sound. It utilizes a cylindrical tube partially filled with water and a tuning fork to create resonance at specific air column lengths. The technique not only helps in determining the speed of sound but also in comparing the frequencies of different tuning forks. Through various examples, the method’s application is illustrated, emphasizing its role in understanding wave phenomena.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q: What is the significance of the speed of sound in the resonance column calculations?
A:
The speed of sound is a crucial parameter in resonance column calculations. It links the frequency of the sound (provided by the tuning fork) to the wavelength (determined from the column length). Using the wave equation (speed = frequency × wavelength), we can calculate one of these parameters if we know the other two. In practice, the resonance column method is often used to experimentally determine the speed of sound by measuring resonance lengths for known frequencies. Conversely, if the speed of sound is known, the method can be used to determine unknown frequencies
Q: How does the concept of wave interference apply in the resonance column experiment?
A:
Wave interference is fundamental to the resonance column experiment. The standing wave pattern observed in the column is a result of interference between the incident waves from the tuning fork and the reflected waves from the water surface. Constructive interference occurs when these waves are in phase, leading to the amplification of sound at resonance frequencies. Destructive interference, where the waves are out of phase, results in the formation of nodes. The clear resonance we hear and measure is a direct result of this constructive interference at specific column lengths corresponding to the wavelength of the sound.
Q: Can the resonance column method be used to study sound diffraction?
A:
While the resonance column method is not primarily designed to study diffraction, some aspects of diffraction can be observed. Diffraction occurs when waves encounter obstacles or openings comparable to their wavelength. In the resonance column, diffraction effects are most noticeable at the open end of the tube, where sound waves spread out into the surrounding air. This diffraction contributes to the end correction phenomenon. By experimenting with tubes of different diameters or adding different shaped openings to the tube, one could qualitatively observe how these changes affect the diffraction and, consequently, the resonance behavior.
Q: How does the end correction in the resonance column relate to the concept of effective length?
A:
The end correction in the resonance column introduces the concept of effective length. The effective length of the air column is slightly longer than the physical length measured from the water surface to the top of the tube. This is because the antinode of the standing wave actually forms slightly above the open end of the tube. The difference between the effective length and the physical length is the end correction. Understanding this helps explain why calculations based solely on the measured physical length may lead to slight inaccuracies, and why the end correction is necessary for more precise determinations of wavelength and sound speed.
Q: What is the relationship between the resonance column experiment and organ pipes in musical instruments?
A:
The resonance column experiment and organ pipes operate on the same basic principles of standing waves in air columns. Both systems create resonance when the length of the air column matches a multiple of quarter-wavelengths of the sound. The main difference is that in an organ pipe, the sound is generated by blowing air across an edge (like blowing across a bottle top), while in the resonance column, the sound comes from an external source (the tuning fork). Understanding the resonance column can help explain how different lengths of organ pipes produce different notes and how closed and open pipes behave differently.
Q: How does the concept of wave nodes relate to the positions of resonance in the column?
A:
Wave nodes are points in a standing wave where the displacement is consistently zero. In the resonance column, the water surface always acts as a node because the water doesn't allow air movement. For the fundamental frequency, there's only one node (at the water surface) and one antinode (near the open end). Each higher harmonic adds another node-antinode pair. The positions of these nodes determine the resonance lengths: for the fundamental, the length is about 1/4 wavelength; for the first overtone, it's about 3/4 wavelength, and so on. Understanding this pattern is key to interpreting the resonance positions and calculating wavelengths.
Q: Can the resonance column method be used to study sound intensity?
A:
While the resonance column method is not primarily designed for studying sound intensity, it can provide some qualitative insights. The perceived loudness of the resonance is related to the intensity of the standing wave. By comparing the loudness of resonances at different harmonics or with different tuning forks, one can gain a qualitative understanding of how frequency and air column properties affect sound intensity. However, for quantitative measurements of sound intensity, other methods and instruments (like sound level meters) are more appropriate.
Q: Can the resonance column method be used to study the behavior of sound in different gases?
A:
Yes, the resonance column method can be adapted to study the behavior of sound in different gases. By filling the tube with various gases instead of air, we can compare the speed of sound in these different media. This can provide insights into how factors like molecular mass and the ratio of specific heats affect sound propagation. However, such experiments require careful setup to ensure gas purity and safety, especially when using gases other than air.
Q: How does the concept of wave reflection apply to the resonance column method?
A:
Wave reflection is crucial to the resonance column method. Sound waves from the tuning fork enter the tube and reflect off the water surface at the bottom. This reflection creates a return wave that interferes with the incoming waves. When the length of the air column is appropriate, the reflected waves reinforce the incoming waves, creating a standing wave pattern. The constructive interference at specific frequencies and column lengths is what produces the resonance we observe and measure.
Q: What is the significance of the fundamental frequency in the resonance column experiment?
A:
The fundamental frequency, or first harmonic, is the lowest frequency at which resonance occurs in the column. It corresponds to a standing wave with a node at the closed end (water surface) and an antinode at the open end, with the air column length approximately equal to one-quarter of the wavelength. The fundamental frequency is significant because it provides the basis for understanding higher harmonics and allows for the simplest calculation of the speed of sound. It's often the easiest resonance to identify clearly in the experiment.