To Find The Mass Of A Given Body Using A Metre Scale By Principle Of Moments

To Find The Mass Of A Given Body Using A Metre Scale By Principle Of Moments

Edited By Vishal kumar | Updated on Jul 02, 2025 07:16 PM IST

For a system in equilibrium, the principle demands that the total moments in a clockwise direction should equal those in counter-clockwise directions. If you balance such a scale on its pivot using a meter stick as if it were a force multiplier or lever arm you can unravel the mass of an unknown object. By placing an object whose mass is unknown on one side of the meter stick and balancing it by adding a known mass on the other side, we can work out what is the unknown mass.

This Story also Contains
  1. Aim
  2. Apparatus
  3. Theory
  4. Calculation
  5. Procedure
  6. ResultThe unknown mass of the body, $\mathrm{m}=\ldots \mathrm{g}$.
  7. Precautions
  8. Solved Examples Based on Find The Mass of a Given Body Using a Metre Scale by Principle of Moments
  9. Summary

The principle of moments is very important. It shows us how we can get the weight of any object using a meter rule. If we make the moment of force about the pivot point equal on both sides, we will weigh our object accurately by taking advantage of the state of balance. This is very important especially when it comes to applying physics in real-life situations since it guarantees that experimental arrangements are accurate. Over the last ten years of the JEE Main exam (from 2013 to 2023), a total of one question has been asked on this concept.

Aim

To determine the mass of a given body using a metre scale by the principle of moments.

Apparatus

A metre scale, a broad heavy wedge with a sharp edge, a weight box, a body of unknown mass.

Theory

If m and M are the mass of the body and the mass of the weight used and a and A are the distances of their loops from wedge. Then, power (mass) arm =a, weight arm =A
From the principle of moments m.g.a=M.g.A

$m=M \frac{A}{a}$

m = mass of body

M is the mass of the weight

A is the distance from the wedge

Calculation

Mean mass, $\quad m=\frac{m_1+m_2+m_3}{3} \mathrm{~g}=\ldots \mathrm{g}$
It will be found that $\quad M_1=M_2=M_3=m$ in all cases.

Procedure

1. Arrange the meter scale in a horizontal position by supporting it at the 50 cm mark at the sharp edge of the broad heavy wedge.

2. Take a loop thread.

3. Suspended the given body whose mass is to be determined by the loop thread at a fixed mark on the left of the wedge.

4. Suspend a paper pan on the right side of the wedge.

5. Put some known weight in the pan.

Result
The unknown mass of the body, $\mathrm{m}=\ldots \mathrm{g}$.

Precautions

1. The wedge should be broad and heavy with a sharp edge.
2. The metre scale should have uniform mass distribution.
3. Threads used for loops should be thin, light and strong

Solved Examples Based on Find The Mass of a Given Body Using a Metre Scale by Principle of Moments

Example 1: The wedge is kept below the 60 cm mark on the meter scale known masses of 1 kg and 2 kg is hung at the 20 cm and 30 cm mark respectively. Where will a 4 kg mass be hung on the meter scale to balance it? (in cm)

1) 85

2) 90

3) 70

4) 75

Solution:

To find the mass of a given body using a metre scale by the principle of moments

As we learn

To find the mass of a given body using a metre scale by the principle of moments

$m=M \frac{A}{a}$

Calculation

$m=\frac{m_1+m_2+m_3}{3}$

m = mean mass

At equilibrium, net moment = 0


$\begin{aligned} & \Rightarrow 1 \mathrm{~kg} \times 40 \mathrm{~cm}+2 \mathrm{~kg} \times 30 \mathrm{~cm}=4 \mathrm{~kg} x \\ & x=25 \mathrm{~cm} \text { (from wedge) }\end{aligned}$

Distance from end = 85 cm

Hence, the answer is the option (1).

Example 2: A metre scale is balanced on a knife edge at its centre. When two coins, each of mass 10 g are put on top of the other at the 10.0 cm mark the scale is found to be balanced at the 40.0 cm mark. The mass of the metre scale is found to be $\mathrm{x} \times 10^{-2} \mathrm{~kg}$. The value of x is $\qquad$ .

1) 6

2) 8

3) 7

4) 5

Solution:



Let the mass of the metre scale \&
Coin be $M$ and $m$ respectively.
For a scale to be balanced, $\Sigma \mathrm{F}=0$ and $\Sigma \tau=0$
$R$ is the reaction force on a knife edge

$
\begin{aligned}
& \Sigma \mathrm{F}=0 \\
& \mathrm{R}=2 \mathrm{mg}+\mathrm{Mg} \\
& \Sigma \tau=0
\end{aligned}
$

about knife edge

$
\begin{aligned}
& (2 \mathrm{mg})(30)(\leftarrow)+\mathrm{Mg} \times 10(\rightarrow)=0 \\
& \mathrm{~m}=\frac{\mathrm{M}}{6} \Rightarrow \mathrm{M}=6 \mathrm{M} \\
& \quad=609 \\
& \mathrm{M}=6 \times 10^{-2} \mathrm{~kg} \\
& \therefore \mathrm{x}=6
\end{aligned}
$

Hence, the answer is the option (1).

Example 3: A meter scale with a least count of 0.1 cm is used to measure the length of an object. The zero of the scale coincides with one end of the object. The measured length is found to be 37.8 cm. Determine the actual length of the object, considering the zero error.

1) 40 cm

2) 37.8 cm

3) 45 cm

4) 37.8 mm

Solution:

Given:

Least count of meter scale L = 0.1 cm

The measured length of the object Lmeasured = 37.8 cm

Step 1: Determine the zero error (Ezero) of the meter scale. Since the zero of the scale coincides with one end of the object, Ezero = 0 cm.

Step 2: Calculate the actual length (Lactual) of the object using the corrected length:

Lactual = Lmeasured - Ezero

Lactual = 37.8 cm - 0 cm

Step 3: Calculate Lactual:

Lactual = 37.8 cm

The actual length of the object is 37.8 cm.

Hence, the answer is the option (2).

Example 4: An experiment is conducted to measure the length of a metal rod using a meter scale. The reading on the meter scale at the left end is 5 cm, and the reading at the right end is 21 cm. Determine the length of the metal rod.

1) 16 mm

2) 160 cm

3) 160 mm

4) 1.6 cm

Solution:

Given values:

Reading at the left end (L) = 5 cm

Reading at the right end (R) = 21 cm

The length of the metal rod (D) can be calculated by subtracting the reading at the left end from the reading at the right end:

D = R - L

Calculate the length of the metal rod:

D = 21 cm - 5 cm = 16 cm

The length of the metal rod is 16 cm.

The length of the metal rod is calculated to be 16 cm or 160 mm.

Hence, the answer is the option (3).

Example 5: A torque metre is calibrated to reference standards with the mass, length and also with time, each will have 15% accuracy, after this calibration, measured torque with this torque meter, we will have net accuracy is

1) 78%

2) 76%

3) 75%

4) 80%

Solution:

As torque

$\begin{aligned} & =m L^2 T-2 \\ \frac{\Delta \tau}{\tau} & =\frac{\Delta m}{m}+\frac{2 \Delta L}{L}+2 \frac{\Delta T}{T}\end{aligned}$

$\begin{array}{r}\frac{\Delta \tau}{\tau} \times 100=15+2 \times 15+2 \times 15 \\ =15+30+30 \\ =75 \%\end{array}$

Hence, the answer is the option (3).

Summary

In order to determine the magnitude of a body located at an unknown distance, one uses a meter rule in conformity with the moment's principle. Here, one end is brought into equilibrium with the body, while another known quantity constitutes the other in terms of weight distribution or placement. If we were to consider balance, it would mean that when the object from one direction exerts a force (or pulls), there is another force acting upon it from the other direction to keep everything stable and ensure no topple-over.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. How does the material of the meter scale affect the experiment?
The material affects the scale's uniformity, rigidity, and weight distribution. An ideal scale would be perfectly uniform and rigid. Materials like metal or hard plastic are preferable to wood, which might bend or have non-uniform density.
2. How does the elasticity of the meter scale affect measurements?
A highly elastic scale might bend under weight, changing the effective distances and introducing errors. A rigid scale is preferable. If some bending is unavoidable, it should be consistent and minimal, and potentially accounted for in advanced calculations.
3. Can this method be used to find the mass of a magnet?
Yes, but with caution. The magnetic field might interact with metal parts of the setup, affecting the balance. Using non-magnetic materials for the scale and supports can minimize this issue. The principle remains the same, but extra care is needed in setup and execution.
4. How does temperature affect the accuracy of this method?
Temperature can affect the experiment by causing thermal expansion or contraction of the meter scale, potentially changing its length slightly. However, for most classroom experiments, this effect is negligible unless there are extreme temperature changes.
5. What role does friction play at the pivot point?
Friction at the pivot can prevent the scale from achieving perfect balance, introducing small errors. Minimizing friction (e.g., using a sharp pivot or bearings) improves accuracy. However, some friction is necessary to prevent constant oscillation.
6. What happens if the masses are not point masses but distributed over a length?
For distributed masses, you need to consider their center of mass rather than their edge or arbitrary point. This might require additional calculations or measurements to determine the effective point where the mass acts on the scale.
7. How does the acceleration due to gravity (g) affect the measurements?
The value of g doesn't affect the relative balance of moments, as it acts equally on all masses. However, if you're using force (weight) in your calculations rather than mass, variations in g between locations could affect the results. For most Earth-based experiments, this variation is negligible.
8. How does the distribution of mass in the meter scale itself affect measurements?
If the meter scale's mass is not uniformly distributed, it can introduce errors. Ideally, the scale should have uniform mass distribution along its length. Any non-uniformity should be accounted for in calculations or by using the scale's center of mass as a reference point.
9. How does the concept of center of mass apply to this experiment?
The center of mass is the effective point where the entire mass of an object can be considered concentrated. For uniform objects, it's at the geometric center. Understanding this helps in placing objects correctly on the scale and in considering the scale's own mass distribution.
10. How does the length of the meter scale affect the accuracy of measurements?
A longer scale allows for greater distances between masses, which can improve accuracy by magnifying differences in moments. However, a longer scale might also introduce more errors due to bending or non-uniformity. The ideal length balances these factors and suits the masses being measured.
11. Can this method determine the mass of any object, regardless of its size?
This method is limited by the length and strength of the meter scale. Very large or heavy objects may not be practical to measure this way. The object must be small enough to be placed on the scale and light enough not to break it.
12. What are the main sources of error in this experiment?
Main sources of error include: imprecise measurement of distances, friction at the pivot point, non-uniform distribution of mass in the meter scale, and slight bending of the scale under weight. Careful setup and multiple trials can help minimize these errors.
13. Why is it important to ensure the meter scale is horizontal?
A horizontal scale ensures that the perpendicular distance from the pivot to the line of action of each weight is accurately measured. If the scale is tilted, it introduces errors in distance measurements and affects the balance of moments.
14. Can this method be used to find the mass of a liquid?
Yes, but indirectly. You would need to contain the liquid in a vessel of known mass. By finding the total mass of the container plus liquid and subtracting the container's mass, you can determine the liquid's mass.
15. How does this method compare to using electronic scales for accuracy?
While electronic scales can be more precise for direct mass measurements, this method provides valuable insights into physics principles. It may be less accurate due to various factors like friction and measurement errors, but it offers a deeper understanding of moments and equilibrium.
16. What happens if the unknown mass is placed exactly at the center of the scale?
If the unknown mass is at the center (pivot point), it creates no moment and cannot be measured using this method. The unknown mass must be placed at a distance from the pivot to create a measurable moment.
17. Can this method be used to find the mass of an object lighter than the scale itself?
Yes, but it requires careful setup. You might need to add known masses to both sides of the scale to create a measurable difference. The calculations become more complex but still follow the principle of moments.
18. Can this method be used to find the mass of a non-rigid object?
Yes, but with limitations. Non-rigid objects may deform or shift their center of mass when placed on the scale, potentially affecting accuracy. It's best to use a container or platform to hold such objects stable during measurement.
19. What is the significance of the fulcrum in this experiment?
The fulcrum serves as the pivot point around which moments are calculated. Its position determines the lever arms for each mass. A stable, friction-minimized fulcrum is essential for accurate measurements and proper application of the principle of moments.
20. How does air resistance affect the measurement?
Air resistance has a negligible effect on this static equilibrium experiment. It would only become significant if the scale were moving or if there were strong air currents, which should be avoided during the experiment.
21. How does the precision of distance measurements affect the final result?
Distance measurements are crucial in this method. Even small errors in measuring distances can lead to significant errors in the calculated mass. Using precise measuring tools and taking multiple measurements can improve accuracy.
22. Can this method be used to find negative mass?
No, this method cannot measure negative mass as negative mass doesn't exist in classical physics. The principle of moments deals with real, positive masses. Any calculation resulting in a negative mass indicates an error in setup or calculation.
23. What is the importance of taking multiple measurements in this experiment?
Multiple measurements help reduce random errors and increase precision. By averaging several trials, you can obtain a more accurate result. It also allows for the calculation of standard deviation, giving an idea of the measurement's uncertainty.
24. How can you account for the mass of the meter scale itself in calculations?
To account for the scale's mass, you can either:
25. Can this method be used to find the mass of a gas?
Directly, no. Gases need to be contained, and their mass is typically too small for this method. However, you could measure the mass of a container before and after filling it with gas, using the principle of moments, and calculate the gas mass by difference.
26. What is the principle of moments and how does it relate to finding mass?
The principle of moments states that when an object is in equilibrium, the sum of clockwise moments equals the sum of counterclockwise moments about any point. In finding mass, we use this principle by balancing a meter scale with known and unknown masses, allowing us to calculate the unknown mass based on the distances from the pivot point.
27. Why use a meter scale instead of a regular balance to find mass?
A meter scale allows for a more precise measurement of distances, which is crucial in applying the principle of moments. It also demonstrates the concept of torque and rotational equilibrium, providing a deeper understanding of physics principles compared to a simple balance.
28. How does gravity play a role in this experiment?
Gravity is crucial as it provides the downward force that creates the moments. The principle of moments works because gravitational force acts uniformly on all masses, allowing us to compare known and unknown masses based on their distances from the pivot.
29. How does the concept of torque relate to this experiment?
Torque is the rotational equivalent of force, calculated as force multiplied by distance from the axis of rotation. In this experiment, we're essentially balancing torques on either side of the pivot point, which is why both mass and distance are crucial in the calculations.
30. How does changing the position of the pivot point affect the measurement?
Changing the pivot point doesn't affect the final result if calculations are done correctly. The principle of moments holds true for any chosen pivot point. However, selecting a convenient pivot point (like the center of the meter scale) can simplify calculations.
31. How does atmospheric pressure affect this experiment?
Atmospheric pressure has a negligible direct effect on this experiment as it acts equally on all parts of the setup. However, significant changes in pressure might affect the density of air, which could slightly impact buoyancy, but this effect is usually too small to consider in typical conditions.
32. How does the shape of the object being measured affect the experiment?
The object's shape affects how it sits on the scale and where its center of mass is located. Irregularly shaped objects might need to be positioned carefully to ensure their weight acts at a specific point. Using a small platform or container can help standardize the placement of differently shaped objects.
33. What role does the moment of inertia play in this experiment?
While moment of inertia is crucial in rotational dynamics, it doesn't directly affect this static equilibrium experiment. However, understanding moment of inertia can help in grasping why the distribution of mass along the scale matters.
34. Can this method be used to find the mass of a charged object?
Yes, the electrical charge of an object doesn't significantly affect its mass or the gravitational forces involved in this experiment. However, ensure that the charged object doesn't interact electrostatically with the scale or other parts of the setup, which could introduce errors.
35. How does the concept of mechanical advantage relate to this experiment?
Mechanical advantage in levers (which is essentially what this setup is) is the ratio of output force to input force. In this experiment, we're not using mechanical advantage to lift weights, but understanding it helps in grasping why changing distances affects the balance so significantly.
36. What would happen if you conducted this experiment in a vacuum?
In a vacuum, the experiment would work essentially the same way, as gravity is still present. The main difference would be the absence of air resistance and buoyancy effects, which are usually negligible in standard conditions anyway. This could potentially lead to slightly more accurate results.
37. How does the principle of conservation of energy relate to this static equilibrium setup?
While the principle of conservation of energy is not directly applied in this static scenario, it underlies the concept. The balanced state represents a minimum potential energy configuration. Any deviation from this balance would increase potential energy, which explains why the system naturally seeks equilibrium.
38. Can this method be used to measure mass in a non-Earth environment, like on the Moon?
Yes, the principle of moments works anywhere with gravity. On the Moon, the masses would weigh less due to lower gravity, but their relative weights would remain proportional. The setup and calculations would be identical, just with different numerical values for weights if you're working with force rather than mass.
39. How does the precision of the known masses affect the accuracy of determining the unknown mass?
The precision of known masses directly impacts the accuracy of the unknown mass determination. Any error in the known masses will propagate through the calculations. Using calibrated, high-precision known masses is crucial for accurate results.
40. What would happen if you used a non-linear scale instead of a uniform meter scale?
A non-linear scale would complicate the experiment significantly. The principle of moments assumes a linear relationship between distance and moment. With a non-linear scale, you'd need to account for the varying "effective distances" along the scale, making calculations much more complex and potentially less accurate.
41. How does this method relate to the concept of mechanical equilibrium?
This method is a direct application of mechanical equilibrium, specifically rotational equilibrium. The balance of moments represents a state where there's no net torque on the system, which is the definition of rotational equilibrium. Understanding this helps in grasping why the system remains stationary when properly balanced.
42. Can this method be used to find the mass of a spinning object?
In theory, yes, but it would introduce complications. A spinning object has angular momentum which could affect the balance. To use this method effectively, you'd need to ensure the object's rotation doesn't impart any net force or torque to the scale, perhaps by containing it in a frictionless enclosure.
43. How does the concept of lever arms apply in this experiment?
Lever arms are crucial in this experiment. They are the perpendicular distances from the pivot point to the line of action of each force (weight). The product of force and lever arm gives the moment. Understanding lever arms is key to grasping why the position of masses on the scale is as important as their magnitude.
44. What would happen if you tried to measure the mass of a radioactive substance using this method?
The principle would work the same for a radioactive substance. However, safety precautions would be paramount. Also, if the substance is rapidly decaying, its mass might change noticeably during the experiment, potentially affecting results in long or repeated measurements.
45. How does the resolution of the meter scale affect the precision of mass determination?
The resolution of the scale (i.e., the smallest division you can read) directly affects the precision of distance measurements. Higher resolution allows for more precise positioning of masses and more accurate distance readings, leading to more precise mass calculations. However, the overall accuracy is also limited by other factors like the precision of known masses and the sensitivity of the balance.
46. Can this method be adapted to measure mass in a system with varying gravity, like a moving elevator?
In a system with varying gravity (like an accelerating elevator), this method becomes more complex. The apparent weight of objects changes with acceleration, affecting the moments. To use this method in such a scenario, you'd need to account for the additional acceleration in your calculations or ensure the entire system is in an inertial frame of reference.
47. How does the stiffness of the meter scale affect the accuracy of measurements?
The stiffness of the scale is crucial for accuracy. A very flexible scale will bend under the weight of the masses, changing the effective distances and introducing errors. A stiffer scale maintains its shape better, ensuring that the measured distances accurately represent the lever arms in the moment calculations.
48. Can this method be used to find the mass of a composite object made of different materials?
Yes, this method can determine the total mass of a composite object regardless of its composition. The principle of moments deals with the object's total mass and its center of mass position. However, this method can't distinguish between the masses of different components within the composite object.
49. How does the concept of static friction at the pivot point affect the sensitivity of the balance?
Static friction at the pivot point can reduce the sensitivity of the balance. It creates a small range of positions where the scale appears balanced even if the moments aren't exactly equal. Minimizing this friction (e.g., using a sharp pivot or bearings) increases sensitivity, allowing for more precise measurements.
50. Can this method be used to verify the equivalence of gravitational and inertial mass?
While this method primarily deals with gravitational mass, it can be part of a broader experiment to verify mass equivalence. By comparing the results of this gravitational method with an inertial method (like measuring acceleration under a known force), one could demonstrate the equivalence principle. However, the precision required for a meaningful test would be challenging to achieve with basic equipment.

Articles

Back to top