Dragos Rule

Introduction

Drago's rule is an empirically based concept applied with an understanding of bond angles and molecular geometries of some hydrides; particularly, those that contain the elements of groups 15 and 16 from the periodic table are considered. This is admitted to include elements in the third period and lower, like phosphorus, arsenic, antimony, sulfur, selenium, and tellurium. Knowing Drago's rule enables a chemist to set better approximations of how these molecules will act while in different chemical reactions and under various conditions.

JEE Main 2025: Chemistry Formula | Study Materials | High Scoring Topics | Preparation Guide

JEE Main 2025: Syllabus | Sample Papers | Mock Tests | PYQs | Study Plan 100 Days

NEET 2025: Syllabus | High Scoring Topics |  PYQs

Drago's rule postulates that under certain conditions, specifically when there is a center atom with at least one lone pair of electrons, the hybridization of orbitals of the central atom is not necessary. In contrast, atomic orbitals overlap directly, providing unique bond angles and hence molecular shapes, quite far from what is traditional for hybridized models. It is an insight important not only for theoretical chemistry but also with many practical consequences in areas as diverse as materials science, organic synthesis, and catalysis.

These are basic underlying concepts of Drago's rule, along with a great deal of miscellaneous issues and implications applying to it directly. This paper is going to try to explain such concepts while giving an example of how important Drago's rule is in real-life applications and academic research. Quite obviously, the readers will understand how Drago's rule works and not only that but also why the phenomenon has become so prominent in molecular geometry.

Conditions and Implications of the Drago Rule

The following must be met for Drago's rule to be valid in a good number of cases:
1. Lone Pairs: The central atom has to contain a lone pair of electrons.
2. Element Group: It has to be a member of groups 13 through 16, be on the third period, and be on.
3. Electronegativity: The centrality of the atom, concerning electronegativity, should be 2.5 or less.

In such cases, the sum of sigma bonds and lone pairs on the central atom becomes four. Hybridization is hence not required, and atomic orbitals may directly participate in bond formation. This leads to odd molecular geometries which do not ideally fall into conventional theories of hybridization.

Bond Angle

Bond angle is the angle between two bonds that form between two atoms. The figure given below illustrates the concept.

Drago’s Rule

Drago’s rule is an empirical rule that is used to explain the bond angles of hydrides of groups 14, 15, and 16 and 2nd members of each of these three groups.

According to Drago’s rule when the various conditions are satisfied as mentioned below, then the energy difference will be very high between the participating atomic orbitals, and hence no mixing of orbitals or hybridization takes place.

• At least one lone pair must be present on the central atom.

• The central atom must be off or below 3rd period.

• The electronegativity of the surrounding atoms must be less than or equal to 2.1.

• For these hydrides, hybridization does not take place, and thus bonding takes place only through pure atomic p orbitals like in PH₃ and hence the bond angle will be approximately 90⁰.

For example, the bond angle for H₂O is 104.50 but for S₂H, Se₂H, and Te₂H, the bond angles are approximately 90⁰.

Real-Life Applications and Relativity

Drago's rule has a huge impact on describing the behavior of so many molecules in such diverse areas. Take for instance the compound phosphine, PH₃. The central phosphorus atom contains a lone pair of electrons. As we all have an idea, it falls under group 15 in the periodic table. In addition, its electronegativity is 2.19. Applying Drago's rule, it could easily be derived that the s-character percent in P-H bonds is less, about 6%. Hence, the lone pair in the compound remains in an orbital that is highly rich in s-character. This is something that never happens in a hybridized orbital. This causes the bond angle to be about 90°, which again deviates from the idealized geometry of a tetrahedron.

The latter rule is thus applied in organic synthesis, catalysis, and materials science, among others. Hence, a clear view of the molecular geometry and the bond angle of a certain hydride would help a chemist realize its reactivity, stability, and applicability in various fields. For instance, knowing the properties of phosphine it can be used for agricultural chemistry as a pesticide or in the synthesis of some other chemical compound.

Also, since chemists can define how different geometries at the molecular level will change the eventual characteristics of a material, Drago's rule helps in the design of new materials with preselected properties. Hence, considering a change in research, the areas of its applicability and importance of Drago's rule may become broad enough to contribute to Chemistry and its development with regards to applicability.

You can enhance your learning by youtube video

Some Solved Examples

Example 1:

Question:

Why is $({NH} _3$ a stronger Lewis base than $({PH} _3)$ ?

Solution:

In $({NH}_3)$, the lone pair is present in one of the $({sp}^3)$ hybridized orbitals. This makes it more available for donation, enhancing its Lewis base character. In contrast, in $({PH}_3)$, the lone pair resides in a pure s-orbital, which is less effective at participating in bonding due to its lower energy and spherically symmetrical shape. As a result, the lone pair donation capacity of $({NH}_3)$ is stronger than that of $({PH}_3)$.

Therefore, the correct answer is option (1).

Example 2:

Question:

As the s-character of a hybridized orbital decreases, the bond angle:

1) Decreases (correct)
2) Increases
3) Does not change
4) Becomes zero

Solution:

The bond angle decreases as the s-character of hybridized orbitals decreases. In $({sp}^3)$ hybridization, the s-character is $( \frac{1}{4} )$, and the bond angle is approximately $(109.5^0)$. In $({sp}^2)$ hybridization, the s-character is $( \frac{1}{3} )$, resulting in a bond angle of $(120^0)$. In $({sp})$ hybridization, the s-character is $( \frac{1}{2} )$, and the bond angle is $(180^0)$.

Therefore, option (1) is correct.

Example 3:

Question:

The HCH bond angle in {HCHO} is nearly equal to:

1) $(120^0)$ (correct)
2) $(90^0)$
3) $(60^0)$
4) $(180^0)$

Solution:

The hybridization of carbon in {HCHO}is $({sp}^2)$, resulting in a planar structure with bond angles close to $(120^0)$. The presence of a double bond to oxygen influences the geometry, maintaining the bond angle near $(120^0)$.

Hence, option (1) is correct.

Example 4:

Question:

Which one of the following compounds has the smallest bond angle in its molecule?

1) ${SO} _2$
2) ${OH} _2$
3)$({SH}_2)$(correct)
4) ${NH}_{-}$

Solution:

The bond angle in ${H}_2{S}$ is approximately $(92.5^0)$, which is smaller than the bond angles in $({SO}_2)$, $({H}_2{O})$, and $({NH}_3)$. $({H}_2{S})$ has a bent shape with two lone pairs, similar to $({H}_2{O})$, but the larger size of sulfur compared to oxygen reduces the bond angle further.

Therefore, the answer is option (3).

Example 5:

Question:

The dipole moments of $({CCl}_4)$, $({CHCl}_3)$, and $({CH}_4)$ are in the order:

1) $\mathrm{CH}_4=\mathrm{CCl}_4<\mathrm{CHCl}_3$

2)$\mathrm{CHCl}_3<\mathrm{CH}_4=\mathrm{CCl}_4$

3)$\mathrm{CH}_4<\mathrm{CCl}_4<\mathrm{CHCl}_3$

4)$\mathrm{CCl}_4<\mathrm{CH}_4<\mathrm{CHCl}_3$

Solution:

The molecular geometry of $({CCl}_4)$ and $({CH}_4)$ is tetrahedral, with their dipole moments canceling out due to symmetry, resulting in a dipole moment of zero for both. However, $({CHCl}_3)$ (chloroform) is not symmetrical because it has three chlorine atoms and one hydrogen atom, giving it a net dipole moment.

Thus, the correct order is$\mathrm{CH}_4=\mathrm{CCl}_4<\mathrm{CHCl}_3$

Conclusion

In a nutshell, one such principle that aids inorganic chemistry in obtaining knowledge about molecular geometries and bond angles of certain hydride molecules is Drago's rule. Therefore, it can be done that much prediction and explanation of the behavior of these molecules under different contexts by the chemist, based on an understanding of the conditions under which this rule operates and its implications. The rule enhances the theoretical appreciation but at the same time is also of practical application in many fields, from materials science to organic synthesis. The more research that is done on this principle, the likelier it is that the relevance of Drago's rule is going to increase, finally opening up new processes in the innovation of chemistry. If the rules Drago established are well understood, then every student and every professional has a better way of understanding molecular interaction and the basic forces underlying chemical change.